1. Can a governmental entity escape 42 U.S.C. § 1983 liability for failing to have procedural safeguards in its speech licensing scheme by—only after being sued for those violations—amending its regulations to remove any content-based speech regulations therein?

2. Are definitive, objective standards required to be contained in speech licensing schemes that lack content-based regulations, but also lack any standards setting forth the bases for denying a license to speak?

Can a governmental entity escape 42 US.C. § 1983 liability for failing to have procedural safeguards in its speech licensing scheme by—only after being sued ii QUESTIONS PRESENTED—Continued for those violations—amending its regulations to remove any content-based speech regulations therein?