No. 23-1045
835 Hinesburg Road, LLC v. City of South Burlington, Vermont, et al.
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: or whether a property owner is required to submit development-restrictions due-process exhaustion final-decision land-use land-use-permit property-rights regulatory-taking ripeness ripeness-doctrine takings takings-claim
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a takings claim is ripe when a city makes a final decision under existing ordinances denying a land use permit, or whether a property owner is required to submit subsequent development proposals for consideration under future or later-adopted regulations to ripen the claim?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a takings claim is ripe when a city makes a final decision under existing ordinances denying a land use permit, or whether a property owner is required to submit subsequent development proposals for consideration under future or later-adopted regulations to ripen the claim?
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-13
Reply of 835 Hinesburg Road, LLC submitted.
2024-08-13
Reply of petitioner 835 Hinesburg Road, LLC filed. (Distributed)
2024-07-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-11
Brief of South Burlington, VT, et al. in opposition submitted.
2024-07-11
Brief of respondents South Burlington, VT, et al. in opposition filed.
2024-06-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 11, 2024.
2024-06-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 20, 2024 to July 11, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-04-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 20, 2024. See Rule 30.1.
2024-04-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 20, 2024 to June 19, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-04-18
Response Requested. (Due May 20, 2024)
2024-04-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-16
Waiver of right of respondent South Burlington, VT, et al. to respond filed.
2024-03-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 22, 2024)
2023-12-13
Application (23A524) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until March 20, 2024.
2023-12-04
Application (23A524) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 6, 2024 to March 20, 2024, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
835 Hinesburg Road, LLC
Kathryn Daly Valois — Pacific Legal Foundation, Petitioner
South Burlington, VT, et al.
Pietro J. Lynn — Lynn, Lynn, Blackman & Manitsky, P.C., Respondent