No. 19-7602
Joshua Neil Harrell v. Michelle Belyea, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process standing takings civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process eminent-domain jurisdiction legal-opinion procedural-grounds property-rights reasons-for-writ regulatory-takings statement-of-case takings
Latest Conference:
2020-03-20
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Is lacked not or delived i firs hin 0 when the wo ua neget ras the day? e a Riht to Poredurad dhe Process?
Pfectias Pettioners We ai d the atif For detindant Belyecis un imly otion for summas judment/adiudiction that mth t t . any merit?
a. Dd t hak udation?
S Causes of action?
1. FourthAmendomnt Unud Aae
2.E
3. Fourt ion
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What is the proper standard for determining whether a government regulation effects a taking under the Fifth Amendment?
Docket Entries
2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-21
Waiver of right of respondent Michelle Belyea, et al. to respond filed.
2020-01-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2020)
Attorneys
Joshua Neil Harrell
Joshua Neil Harrell — Petitioner
Michelle Belyea, et al.
Lori A. Sebransky — Allen, Glaessner, Hazelwood & Werth LLP, Respondent