No. 22-898
Ronald I. Paul v. South Carolina Department of Transportation, et al.
Tags: declaratory-relief eminent-domain fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment just-compensation property-rights settlement-agreement
Latest Conference:
2023-05-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a settlement agreement in an eminent domain case with three parties and two of the parties agreed to a settlement between them, that did not include the other party, violates the just compensation clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution for the other party, requiring declaratory relief be entered in favor of the other party.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a settlement agreement in an eminent domain case violates the just compensation clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments
Docket Entries
2023-05-22
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
2023-04-27
Reply of petitioner Ronald I. Paul filed.
2023-04-17
Brief of respondents South Carolina Department of Transportation, et al. in opposition filed.
2023-03-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 17, 2023)
Attorneys
Ronald I. Paul
Ronald I. Paul — Petitioner
SC Dept. of Transportation, et al.
Andrew Frederick Lindemann — Lindemann Law Firm, P.A., Respondent