No. 25-278
Jeffrey Lance Hill, Sr. v. Suwannee River Water Management District
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law due-process eminent-domain government-overreach property-rights takings-clause
Key Terms:
Antitrust Takings DueProcess
Antitrust Takings DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2025-11-07
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the government overextended and leveraged their permitting monopoly to take private property in violation the Takings Clause: and
2. Whether the government violated the Eighth Amendment when imposing the $100,000.00 fine; and
3. Whether the government had legal and prudential standing to demand permit be obtained, seek an injunction and foreclose on subsequent money judgments; and
4. Whether the government violated the Due Process Clause by rendering Summary Judgment.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the government violated the Takings Clause and Due Process Clause by leveraging a permitting monopoly to foreclose on private property
Docket Entries
2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-10-10
Waiver of right of respondent Suwannee River Water Management District to respond filed.
2025-07-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 10, 2025)
Attorneys
Jeffrey Hill
Jeffrey Lance Hill Sr. — Petitioner
Suwannee River Water Management District
Chase E. Hattaway — Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A., Respondent