No. 18-6942
Monserrate Zapata v. PECO Energy Company
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction federal-regulatory-commission government-regulation pleading-standards property-rights smart-meter standing state-actor utility-regulation utility-service utility-shut-off
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether judges may make findings of fact at the pleading stage in dismissing claims for "failure to state a claim."
Whether the District Court erred in dismissing Petitioner's claims without allowing discovery regarding whether Defendant PECO is a state actor acting under the Federal Regulatory Commission's authority to install a smart meter without consent.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fourteenth Amendment due process rights were violated when PECO issued shut-off notices to the petitioner for failing to provide access to inspect its meter
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2018-10-01
Motion (18M29) for leave to proceed as a veteran Denied.
2018-08-22
MOTION (18M29) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-06-06
Motion (18M29) for leave to proceed as a veteran filed.
2018-06-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 7, 2019)
Attorneys
Monserrate Zapata
Monserrate Zapata — Petitioner