No. 22-1100

Palani Karupaiyan v. Township of Woodbridge, New Jersey, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2023-05-10
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Experienced Counsel
Tags: 14th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process government-action property-rights section-1982 standing takings writ-of-mandamus
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess FourthAmendment FirstAmendment
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

Petitioner's prayed reliefs were National importance of having the US Supreme Court decide or conflict with USSC ruling, or importance of similarly situated over millions of citizens or the first impression is raised at USSC.

ii) Petitioners' property rights under 42 U.S.C § 1982 and Hindu Successive Act were denied when USSC ruled in Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park. Inc.. 396 US 229 - Supreme Court 1969 @237 "Section 1982 [42 U.S.C § 1982 / covers the right "to inherit, purchase , lease, sell. hold , and convey real and personal property. "

iii) Local Govts/Foreign Govt violating, Parents rights (14th amendment) which were ruled by USSC under Troxel v. Granville. 530 U.S. 57 (2000) and Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U. S. 702, 720.

iv) Local Govts illegally taken away Petitioners property without Jury trial.

v) Local Govts illegally issued arrest warrant without Jury trial.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Supreme Court should grant certiorari to address the national importance of the issues raised, the conflict with prior Supreme Court rulings, and the impact on millions of similarly situated citizens

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-05-05

Attorneys

Palani Karupaiyan
Palani Karupaiyan — Petitioner