No. 18-7592

Zane Hubbard v. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-01-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: access-to-courts appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law court-procedure due-process fair-procedure government-action judicial-review legal-interpretation standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2019-03-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

(1). In CoNTROVERSIEs /NVOLVING TRENSON AND LEVy By
The UiiTeo SnTEs GovernmeNT AwD WiTuiN One STiE WiTH
SoTE GoreRnMieNT AGAiNsT One Orr MoRE OF lres Peop;
WuO duRiSTIOoN Is Ir, To ExeaCiSE LuTCiae PaWER By
THE CONSTITUTIONC) By AAHERING To THE AGRIEVED (?)

(②). SrATE AWO FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAUE UNRENSONNBY
DELAyeD Or DeNID ReLiEF To Me. TuE GOvERNmENT Wil
CONTiNUE To PRESnoCe My ABrITy To OOMIN RELIEF, I Full
ANo FAIR AeTION Is NOr ACCORDED PERSUANT To CONSTITUTIONAL
OCLIGATIONES. WHERE My AOLITy To MEET TECHNICAL REQUREMENTES)
For REVIEW In CoUET ARE INCAPACITATED By MALICIOUS GOVERNmENT,
How Will I Be AfForren A Full Ano Fain Luy TRIAL
To GRiEvE THE WRonGis BEiNG COMmiTTED (?)

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the government's denial of Petitioner's request for a letter of recommendation violates the Constitution by denying the Petitioner's right to due process and fair access to the courts

Docket Entries

2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-25
Waiver of right of respondents Edmund G. Brown, Jr., et al. to respond filed.
2018-12-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 27, 2019)

Attorneys

Edmund G. Brown, Jr., et al.
Tami Michelle KrenzinOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Zane Hubbard
Zane Hubbard — Petitioner