No. 20-5823

Michael R. Spengler v. Los Angeles County District Attorney

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-09-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights collateral-estoppel constitutional-rights contempt-trial double-jeopardy due-process government-action habeas-corpus judicial-procedure pretrial-proceedings
Latest Conference: 2020-12-04
Question Presented (from Petition)

1 pUrSUANT to 28 USC 2241, A pretrial petitioner MAY ChAlleNGe his custodt THAT S IN VIOIAHION OF the consttumon its laws and trenties. COgNIzAble ClAiMS bEING the CONteMPIAtEd triAL ViOlAteS the DEFENDANTS CONSTiTUHONAL RIGHT Q4 /RIGIT OF bEING PIACEd IN Jeopardy twice.- Does this pretTiAl SAFEGUARd resjudiCAta ? IN ClUDE CollAteral estoppel

2.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a pretrial petitioner may challenge his custody as in violation of the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties, and whether this pretrial safeguard includes the protection of collateral estoppel

Docket Entries

2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-07-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 28, 2020)

Attorneys

Michael R. Spengler
Michael R. Spengler — Petitioner