No. 22-5097
Hidey Diaz, aka Silvio Manuel Amador, aka Celio Alvarez-Carrasco v. United States
Tags: 10th-circuit circuit-court-review criminal-sentencing federal-prosecution government-action guideline-range sentencing-disparity sentencing-guidelines statutory-directive substantive-reasonableness unwarranted-disparity
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Tenth Circuit err in concluding that it was barred from considering, on review for the substantive reasonableness of Mr. Diaz's sentence, the fact that his guideline range would have been markedly lower had the government acted as it routinely does in comparable cases?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Tenth Circuit err in concluding that it was barred from considering, on review for the substantive reasonableness of Mr. Diaz's sentence, the fact that his guideline range would have been markedly lower had the government acted as it routinely does in comparable cases?
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-07-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-07-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 12, 2022)
Attorneys
Hidey Diaz
Howard A. Pincus — Fed Pub. Def. for Dist. CO &WY, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent