1. Whether the Second Circuit failed to follow this
Court's precedent when it held that representational
standing does not exist in claims alleging a violation
of 42 U.S.C. § 1983?

2. Whether a First Amendment claim is actionable
against a quasi-governmental actor whose policies
and active partnership with a government entity
and actor led to the issuance of a threat of arrest
and prosecution aimed at suppressing First
Amendment protections that are disfavored as being
anti-Semitic?

3. Whether a public threat of arrest and prosecution
by a government official against an unnamed yet
identifiable group of people constitutes a concrete
and particularized injury for purposes of establishing
Article III standing and whether the lack of
knowledge of which statute the government official
intends to use to effectuate said threat prevents the
ability to establish an injury sufficient for purposes
of Article III standing?

Whether the Second Circuit erred in its interpretation of representational standing under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and First Amendment protections against quasi-governmental actors