| 25A254 |
Michael Broomer v. Brian Emig, Warden, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2025-09-03 |
Presumed Complete |
|
antiterrorism-act federal-review habeas-corpus procedural-default statute-of-limitations timeliness |
Question not identified. |
| 24A410 |
Enbridge Energy, LP, et al. v. Dana Nessel, Attorney General of Michigan |
Sixth Circuit |
2024-10-28 |
Presumed Complete |
|
28-usc-1446b circuit-split federal-question removal-jurisdiction statutory-interpretation timeliness |
Question not identified. |
| 24-5549 |
Norman Paul Felts v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2024-09-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure fourth-circuit-review ineffective-assistance legal-abandonment pro-se-representation timeliness |
Should the Fourth Circuit have addressed the merits of Petitioner's appeal even though it was untimely filed because he alleged that his counsel " aba… |
| 24-5263 |
Pedro Rodriguez v. Officer Fisher |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-08-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
aedpa federal-courts federal-review habeas-corpus ninth-circuit rule-of-lenity state-court timeliness timeliness-rules |
1. Did the Ninth Circuit err in holding that the California Supreme Court's
summary denial of a habeas petition as untimely is beyond review by
federa… |
| 24-5153 |
Jonathan Godwin v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2024-07-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeals certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure-rule-60(b) constitutional-rights eleventh-circuit final-order habeas-corpus habeas-petition procedural-ruling rule-60b standards-of-review timeliness |
1. Whether Petitioner's Rule 60(b) Motion for Relief from judgment filed within a year of the denial of his Habeas Petition timely?
2. Whether the Co… |
| 24-58 |
Lisa Gindi v. New York City Department of Education |
Second Circuit |
2024-07-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
ada ada-violation civil-rights eeoc eeoc-retaliation employment-discrimination plain-error retaliation state-law timeliness whistleblower-protection workers-compensation workplace-harassment wrongful-termination |
1. The first question presented is which court
could have jurisdiction in improving laws
keeping an employee from being terminated
for having reported… |
| 23-7749 |
Carlos Enrique Lopez-Soto v. United States |
First Circuit |
2024-06-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure court-of-appeals dismissal due-process government-objection judicial-procedure notice notice-of-judgment standing timeliness |
Whether the Court of Appeals could dismiss an action based on untimely notice where (1) the district court's judgment was never notified, and (2) in t… |
| 23A1031 |
Ryan Welter v. Medical Professional Mutual Insurance Company, dba Coverys, et al. |
First Circuit |
2024-05-20 |
Presumed Complete |
|
28-usc-1446 federal-question removal-jurisdiction subject-matter-jurisdiction subsequent-paper timeliness |
Question not identified. |
| 23-1156 |
Eun O. Kim, et al. v. Parcel K-Tudor Hall Farm, LLC |
Fourth Circuit |
2024-04-24 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure court-of-appeals due-process equal-protection judicial-discretion legal-representation motion-to-reopen procedural-fairness timeliness |
Whether the Justice system (The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit) granting the Motion to Reopen to one party after 8 years from t… |
| 23-1059 |
Peter Williams v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2024-03-27 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-petition administrative-procedure administrative-procedure-act clean-air-act due-process environmental-protection-agency epa-action petition-for-review standing statutory-interpretation timeliness |
1. Whether Williams could have petitioned for review using non-record rebuttal evidence within 60 days of EPA's initial action.
2. Whether the Act re… |
| 23-6717 |
Steve Van Horne v. Robert Jones, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-02-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure constitutional-rights court-discretion due-process excusable-neglect federal-rules-of-civil-procedure haines-v-kerner legal-technicalities timeliness united-states-v-lee |
1. Do the circumstances surrounding Petitioner, Steve Van Home's filing of a late appeal from the United States District Court of the Northern Distric… |
| 23-6464 |
Michael Edward Aguilar v. Ryan Thornell, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-01-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review certificate-of-appealability constitutional-interpretation criminal-appeal criminal-code due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment state-law statutory-ambiguity timeliness |
Question not identified. |
| 23-559 |
Adekunle C. Omoyosi v. Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-11-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
appeal-timeliness civil-procedure court-discretion due-process eeoc federal-courts judicial-exception legal-procedure procedural-rules standing timeliness |
Whether, or under what circumstances, may the court excuse untimeliness of appeal. |
| 23-5471 |
Scott A. Shreffler v. Pennsylvania |
Pennsylvania |
2023-08-29 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure clerical-error due-process evidentiary-hearing houston-v-lack notice-of-appeal prisoner-mailbox-rule pro-se-filing timeliness |
QUESTION I:
ERRED IN DISMISSING THE PETITIONER'S APPEAL FOR UNTIMELY
FILING OF NOTICE OF APPEAL, BASED ON PETITIONER'S ADMITTED
CLERICAL ERROR OF MI… |
| 23-5436 |
Christopher J. Barnett v. David Guten, District Judge, District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
2023-08-24 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-provisions constitutional-rights due-process judicial-review jurisdictional-issue legal-petition self-representation supreme-court timeliness writ-of-certiorari |
Does representation access the Sixth Amendment person who has dismissed a body affirm profit have timely filed the Petition to See-k Appeal? If a Judg… |
| 22-7710 |
Michael Walker v. Morris Houser, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Benner Township, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2023-06-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-evidence credibility criminal-procedure due-process evidence exclusionary-rule federal-procedure judicial-review standing state-law timeliness |
1) He 5uppieME CowftT SfafeJ 4KaV -Vhe peV.'URfef rO^ '
ReUbitClftifris OF ccfiiVVuFcnal CXCcR tOi-W\ ^uEvJvAence .v6
peYA.cn ^ of ^tu3
r p^-V.-ViC^rW… |
| 22-7447 |
In Re Antonio D. McCaster |
|
2023-05-03 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights district-court due-process habeas-corpus judicial-discretion petition-review procedural-error standing statute-of-limitations timeliness writ-of-certiorari |
1. Whether the United States District Court Northern District of Indiana South Bend Division's "Judge Robert L. Miller, Jr." erred in his decision mak… |
| 22-7161 |
Moses D. Estrada v. California |
California |
2023-03-30 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts appeal-rights appellate-procedure civil-procedure court-of-appeals due-process finality procedural-fairness time-limitation timeliness transcript-denial |
1* JtA.i.-bb«. Served ijKe^ ' 1~ke
)-f's order
S| fcce "flte rwo'floh K^A-S snUrwiH^d feM.es «.ppe.|(«.n.'f' five
opp^r-fi** rfy "t^ ^utUe ^ A-f*pl' «… |
| 22-6611 |
Joseph P. Counts v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
2023-01-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights cohen-collateral-order due-process jurisdictional-issue legal-counsel notice-of-appeal pro-se standing timeliness urgent-matters |
Question not identified. |
| 22-400 |
Mark Barinholtz v. HomeAdvisor, Inc., et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2022-10-31 |
Denied |
|
appellate-review civil-procedure federal-courts federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure judicial-discretion jurisdiction jurisdictional-rules procedural-flexibility timeliness timeliness-doctrine |
Should the federal courts, in an effort to serve the purposes of the public's interest in gaining access to justice, be following timeliness rules app… |
| 22-5794 |
Glen Jones Ward v. Alberto Ramirez, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-10-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel standing timeliness |
Question not identified. |
| 22-5604 |
John Gregory Lambros v. Federative Republic of Brazil, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2022-09-19 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
civil-procedure federal-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure foreign-state foreign-state-defendant jurisdictional-defect motion-to-remand remand removal removal-procedure service-of-process timeliness |
QUESTION ONE (1):
Whether an untimely "Motion for Removal" by a foreign state, 28 U.S.C. 1441(d) - 652 days to late - suffices when the non-jurisdicti… |
| 22-5268 |
Anthony Peters v. Tim Hooper, Warden |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-08-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights due-process federal-court-jurisdiction federal-courts habeas-corpus limitations-defense petition-dismissal procedural-timeliness state-court-review state-courts timeliness |
(1) Whether a federal court lacks authority, on its own initiative, to dismiss a habeas petition as untimely, once the State's highest court has answe… |
| 22-5194 |
Maxo Jean v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2022-07-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2255 appeals appellate-procedure criminal-procedure federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure habeas-corpus judicial-discretion jurisdiction motion-to-vacate timeliness timely-filing |
WHETHER THE APPEALS COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY DIS
MISSING PETITIONER'S "NOTICE OF APPEAL" FROM THE DENIAL OF A
MOTION TO VACATE, FILED PURSUANT … |
| 21-8280 |
James Michael Forney v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-06-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
due-process electronic-dockets federal-rules-of-civil-procedure habeas-corpus judicial-notice procedural-dismissal rule-4 section-2254 timeliness |
Whether Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254, which prohibits a district court from dismissing a habeas corpus pet… |
| 21-8114 |
In Re Jordan Cordell Hudson |
|
2022-06-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights court-filing due-process exceptional-circumstances legal-review mandamus procedural-validity standing supreme-court-procedure supreme-court-rules timeliness writ-of-certiorari |
Where the CREVICE ok Ane Sopreme Cove VG cromnor ied To NSU. FZW)\ (A) ard low Sepveme CouVe PNM % tO vetoss AD RY a eM hen for vrik of Cevbova'' 03 y… |
| 21-8063 |
William Lee Wright Jr. v. California |
California |
2022-06-06 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process faretta faretta-motion judicial-discretion self-representation timeliness totality-of-the-circumstances |
1. Whether, as the majority of jurisdictions hold, a request for self-representation under Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975), is timely if ma… |
| 21-8027 |
Derek J. DeGroot v. Wisconsin |
Wisconsin |
2022-06-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
competency conflict-of-counsel counsel-conflict faretta-colloquy faretta-v-california pro-se-representation self-representation sixth-amendment timeliness trial-court-discretion |
Does the Sixth Amendment require a trial court to conduct a competency colloquy, pursuant to this Court's holding in Faretta v. California, where a de… |
| 21-7913 |
William Earl Sweet v. Florida |
Florida |
2022-05-19 |
Denied |
IFP |
criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection faretta-standard fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus harmless-error self-representation timeliness |
1. Whether the Petitioner's right to self-representation was violated when the trial court denied the Petitioner's request to proceed pro se and the F… |
| 21-1415 |
John Doe v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-05-04 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
constitutional-right-to-informational-privacy constitutional-rights freedom-of-information-act government-records informational-privacy privacy-act relevance single-publication-rule statute-of-limitations timeliness |
1. Does judicial application of the "single publication rule" to all claims arising under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a et seq., deprive private ci… |
| 21-7693 |
Kenneth R. Heddlesten v. Scott Crow, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections |
Tenth Circuit |
2022-04-26 |
Denied |
IFP |
appeals appellate-review civil-procedure criminal-procedure due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus plain-error rule-60b4 timeliness |
How does the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals policy of reviewing plain error only prevent appellate counsel from "raising all claims of error in a … |
| 21-7671 |
Alan E. Strickland v. Scott Crow, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections |
Tenth Circuit |
2022-04-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
actual-innocence certificate-of-appealability due-process equitable-tolling habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel pro-se-pleading procedural-default statutory-interpretation timeliness |
How does the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit justify affirming the decision of the District Court in denying petitioner's petition for COA,… |
| 21-7507 |
Valedia Gross v. First NLC Financial Services, LLC, et al. |
Maryland |
2022-03-31 |
Denied |
IFP |
appeal appeal-waiver case-reopening civil-procedure court-intervention default-judgment legal-procedure motion-to-vacate standing timeliness waiver |
Did the Court of Special Appeals (COSPA) err, as a matter of law, in holding that Ms. Gross waived her right to appeal the circuit court's order vacat… |
| 21-7343 |
Harry Hueston v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2022-03-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure due-process equitable-tolling habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance judicial-discretion legal-remedy procedural-default timeliness |
I. WHETHER IT WAS ERROR FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT TO DENY HUESTION THE RIGHT TO FILE AN APPEAL OR COA WHEN TIMELINESS WAS THE RESULT OF FACTS BEYOND HIS … |
| 21-7294 |
Daniel Gerard Lacey v. Brian M. Gootkin, Director, Montana Department of Corrections, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-03-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certiorari circuit-split foreshadowing ineffective-assistance judicial-review jurisdiction legal-doctrine timeliness writ-of-certiorari |
Whether this Court should grant certiorari so that it can address and resolve a circuit split between the Ninth and the Second, Sixth and Seventh Circ… |
| 21-1178 |
Subhadra Gunawardana, et vir v. American Veterinary Medical Association, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2022-02-25 |
Denied |
|
amendment-standard circuit-split civil-procedure constitutional-claims dispositive-motion due-process federal-rules procedural-waiver seventh-circuit timeliness waiver |
I. This Court has clarified that waiver is the intentional relinquishment/abandonment of a known right. No federal rule specifies deadlines to object … |
| 21-6703 |
Joshua Cumberland v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-12-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2254 actual-innocence certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights district-court fifth-circuit habeas-corpus statutory-provisions timeliness |
(1) Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit properly denied petitioner's Motion for Certificate of Appealability ("COA") as t… |
| 21-648 |
Edward Hedican v. Walmart Stores East, L.P., et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2021-11-03 |
GVR |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (4) |
appeal appellate-procedure certiorari civil-procedure intervention legal-standard motion-to-intervene post-judgment standing statutory-right timeliness |
In Cameron v. EMW Women's Surgical Center, this Court will determine whether the Sixth Circuit erred in holding that the Kentucky Attorney General's m… |
| 21-5969 |
Derrick E. Steilman v. Reginald D. Michael, Director, Montana Department of Corrections, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-10-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review due-process federal-jurisdiction federal-statute habeas-corpus ninth-circuit procedural-timeliness section-2254 standard-of-review statute-of-limitations timeliness |
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred when it determined that Steilman's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition is untimely? |
| 21-5593 |
Dennis Akaazua v. Walker Novack Legal Group, LLC, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2021-09-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure district-court equitable-relief equitable-tolling filing-deadline postal-delivery postal-service pro-se timeliness weather-conditions winter-conditions |
Whether the U.S. District Court which received the removal brief, on behalf of the
Respondents, could Equitably rule that despite (40) degrees below z… |
| 21-5331 |
Zachary R. E. Rusk v. Fidelity Brokerage Services |
Tenth Circuit |
2021-08-11 |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-court-review civil-procedure due-process judicial-interference judicial-procedure jurisdictional-challenge rule-11 rule-11-motion rule-60-motion standing timeliness |
1. Did the 1 Oth circuit apply the law incorrectly?
2. Did the 1 Oth Circuit fail to consider evidence and pleadings that show that Petitioner did pr… |
| 20-1704 |
RonRico Simmons, Jr. v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2021-06-09 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
aedpa evidentiary-hearing government-impediment habeas-corpus limitations-period pro-se timeliness |
To promote the finality of criminal judgments, the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) generally imposes a one-year limitations peri… |
| 20-7792 |
Ralph Stephen Gambina v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-04-19 |
Denied |
IFP |
career-offender criminal-procedure habeas-corpus johnson-ruling johnson-v-united-states mandatory-guidelines residual-clause section-2255 statutory-interpretation timeliness timeliness-provision |
1. Whether a § 2255 motion filed within one year of
Johnson v. United States, claiming that Johnson
invalidates the residual clause of the pre-Booker
… |
| 20-6945 |
Robert White v. Kubotek Corporation, et al. |
First Circuit |
2021-01-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure excusable-neglect federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure motion-for-reconsideration rule-59(e) timeliness timely-filing |
Does the "act" of mailing a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) motion for reconsideration in time for normal US Mail Second Day delivery to the US … |
| 20-6592 |
Edgar Gomez v. Raymond Madden, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-12-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
criminal-procedure criminal-proceeding due-process faretta-right habeas-corpus right-to-counsel self-representation sixth-amendment timeliness |
(1) Was Petitioner's denied his right to self-representation pursuant to Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975) when the trial court denied the re… |
| 20-5863 |
Andrew Newson v. Wisconsin |
Wisconsin |
2020-10-01 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure court-procedure due-process equal-protection mailing-error parental-rights petition-for-review statutory-interpretation termination-of-parental-rights timeliness |
Question not identified. |
| 20-5687 |
John Oliver Bryant v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2020-09-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure district-court due-process judicial-procedure jurisdiction legal-review petition-dismissal standing suspension-clause timeliness |
1. Whether the district court erred in dismissing the petition as untimely.
2. Whether dismissal of the petition violated the Suspension Clause. |
| 20-5422 |
Eric Miller v. James Deal, Warden |
Georgia |
2020-08-20 |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (3)IFP |
civil-procedure due-process filing-requirements postal-service standing timeliness |
Question not identified. |
| 20-5210 |
Ashley L. Dunn v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-07-29 |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2254 civil-procedure due-process equitable-tolling federal-statute habeas-corpus post-conviction-relief procedural-timeliness substantial-showing timeliness |
I. DID PETITIONER MAKE A SUBSTANTIAL SHOWINIG THAT HER 28 U.S.C. 2254 PETITION WAS TIMELY?
II. DID PETITIONER MAKE A SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING THAT HER 28 … |
| 20-5085 |
Joe Edward Johnson v. California |
California |
2020-07-16 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (5)IFP |
batson-challenge criminal-procedure due-process faretta-motion faretta-v-california jury-selection legal-timeliness self-representation timeliness totality-of-circumstances |
1. Whether, as the overwhelming majority of jurisdictions hold, a request for self-representation under Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975), is… |
| 20-5083 |
Telly Kavantzas v. Florida |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-07-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure district-court electronic-dockets federal-courts habeas-corpus judicial-notice rule-4 rules-governing-section-2254-cases section-2254 timeliness |
Whether Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254, which prohibits a district court from dismissing a habeas corpus pet… |
| 20-5006 |
Manuel Olivas-Guevara v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-07-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abduction appeal appeal-timeliness base-offense-level civil-procedure dismissal district-court jurisdiction robbery sentencing-guidelines standing timeliness |
1) DID THE PANEL ERR BY DISMISSING THE APPEAL FOR TIMELINESS?
2) DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR BY AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT'S DECISION TO INCREASE MI… |
| 19-1393 |
Rachelle Davis v. American Airlines, Inc., et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2020-06-18 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
actor civil-rights different-retaliatory-conduct eeoc-charge employment-discrimination lack-of-merit merit pro-se-complaint protected-activity reasonable-accommodation retaliation retaliation-claim same-actor statute-of-limitations timeliness untimely-complaint |
I) Does protection against retaliation apply even if the
original complaint or charge was untimely or was
found to lack merit when initiated by the … |
| 19-8465 |
Earl T. Moore v. Steven Johnson, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2020-05-14 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-procedure appellate-review certificate-of-appealability due-process habeas-corpus procedural-timeliness third-circuit timeliness writ-of-habeas-corpus |
1.) Whether the Third Circuit Court of Appeals Erred in Denying Petitioner a Certificate of Appealability on His Claim that Petition for a Writ of Hab… |
| 19-8219 |
Juan Gilberto Medrano v. Scott Frauenheim, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-04-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure equitable-tolling extraordinary-circumstance extraordinary-circumstances federal-habeas federal-petition habeas-corpus legal-question ninth-circuit timeliness |
(1) Was Petitioner's 2016 Petition filed in a timely manner?
(2) Does the dismissal of a protective federal habeas petition prior to the decision in … |
| 19-8190 |
George Lyle Cullett, Jr. v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-04-06 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
28-usc-2255 career-offender career-offender-guideline johnson-decision johnson-v-united-states mandatory-guidelines pre-booker-sentencing residual-clause section-2255 timeliness timeliness-standard |
1. Whether a § 2255 motion filed within one year of Johnson v. United States, claiming that Johnson invalidates the residual clause of the pre-Booker … |
| 19-8191 |
Benjamin Velasquez v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-04-06 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (4)IFP |
career-offender career-offender-guideline constitutional-vagueness criminal-procedure johnson-decision johnson-v-united-states residual-clause section-2255 sentencing timeliness timeliness-standard |
1. Whether a § 2255 motion filed within one
year of Johnson v. United States, claiming that
Johnson invalidates the residual clause of the pre-
Booker… |
| 19-1178 |
Robert K. Zabka, et ux. v. United States, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2020-03-27 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-procedure-final-judgment-receivership-appeal conflict-of-laws conflicting-precedent due-process federal-courts final-judgment jurisdiction net-operating-loss partnership-property receivership standing tax-liability timeliness |
The Circuits are Conflicted
The First and Second Circuits are in conflict with the Seventh Circuit as to whether the order appointing a receiver is t… |
| 19-7958 |
Anthony Quinones v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-03-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
career-offender career-offender-guideline constitutional-vagueness criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-28-usc-2255 johnson-v-united-states residual-clause section-2255 sentencing timeliness timeliness-standard vagueness |
1. Whether a § 2255 motion filed within one
year of Johnson v. United States, claiming that
Johnson invalidates the residual clause of the pre-
Booker… |
| 19-7976 |
Lonnie Victor Fleming v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-03-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2255 career-offender career-offender-guideline constitutional-vagueness criminal-procedure johnson-v-united-states residual-clause section-2255 sentencing timeliness timeliness-standard |
1. Whether a § 2255 motion filed within one year of Johnson v. United States, claiming that Johnson invalidates the residual clause of the pre-Booker … |
| 19-7977 |
Robert Morris Hoff v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-03-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
career-offender career-offender-guideline constitutional-vagueness criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-28-usc-2255 johnson-v-united-states residual-clause section-2255 sentencing timeliness timeliness-standard vagueness |
1. Whether a § 2255 motion filed within one
year of Johnson v. United States, claiming that
Johnson invalidates the residual clause of the pre-
Booker… |
| 19-7981 |
Marcos Robert Castaneda v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-03-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
career-offender career-offender-guideline criminal-law criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-28-usc-2255 johnson-v-united-states mandatory-sentencing-guidelines ninth-circuit residual-clause sentencing sentencing-guidelines timeliness void-for-vagueness |
1. Whether a § 2255 motion filed within one year of Johnson v. United States, claiming that Johnson invalidates the residual clause of the pre Booker … |
| 19-7912 |
Ali Mehdipour v. Keith Sweeney, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2020-03-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure court-filing dismissal erroneous-ruling fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree judicial-review legal-timeliness prejudice procedural-error review statute-of-limitations timeliness |
1. Does a fruit-of-a-poisonous-tree follow from an initial erroneous ruling on timeliness of filing the initial complaint follow through subsequent ru… |
| 19-7924 |
Shanel Stacz v. ESA Management, LLC, et al. |
California |
2020-03-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure constitutional-amendments court-jurisdiction due-process jurisdiction timeliness transfer-petition writ-of-mandate |
The appellate procedure for Limited Civil cases in California, specifically writ of
mandates have taken on numerous procedures in order to have revie… |
| 19-7933 |
Larry Donnell Bogard v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-03-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2255 career-offender career-offender-guideline constitutional-vagueness due-process johnson-v-united-states mandatory-guidelines residual-clause section-2255 sentencing timeliness |
1. Whether a § 2255 motion filed within one year of
Johnson v. United States, claiming that Johnson
invalidates the residual clause of the pre-Booker … |
| 19-7947 |
Bobby Joe Floyd v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-03-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2255 career-offender-guideline constitutional-vagueness criminal-procedure-28-usc-2255 habeas-corpus johnson-v-united-states mandatory-guidelines mandatory-sentencing-guidelines residual-clause section-2255 timeliness |
1. Whether a § 2255 motion filed within one year of
Johnson v. United States, claiming that Johnson
invalidates the residual clause of the pre-Booker … |
| 19-7785 |
Jacob Daniel Wolf v. Suzanne M. Peery, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-02-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure criminal-appeal due-process evidentiary-hearing habeas-petition post-conviction-relief statutory-tolling time-barred timeliness |
Did the district court properly grant Respondent's motion to dismiss Wolf's habeas petition as time-barred where Respondent conceded that Wolf was ent… |
| 19-7616 |
Fred Blajos v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-02-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2255 bank-robbery career-offender career-offender-guideline crime-of-violence elements-clause habeas-corpus johnson-v-united-states mandatory-guidelines residual-clause section-2255 timeliness |
1. Whether a § 2255 motion filed within one year of
Johnson v. United States, claiming that Johnson
invalidates the residual clause of the pre-Booker … |
| 19-7493 |
Charles T. Kirvin v. L. Grant, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-01-30 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure due-process excusable-neglect good-cause jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge ninth-circuit notice-of-appeal standing timeliness |
Whether THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ARBITRARILY and ERRONEOUSLY Denied APPELLANT NOTICE of Appeal FOR LACK of JURISDICTIO… |
| 19-7316 |
Shawn R. Bough v. Kenneth D. Hutchison, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2020-01-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
actual-innocence corroborating-evidence due-process gateway-evidence precedent reasonable-juror self-preservation sixth-amendment timeliness |
I. Does the Sixth Circuit's failure to analyze the claim in consideration of the overwhelming corroborating innocence proof in Mr. Bough's case, in co… |
| 19-7276 |
Ketut Pujayasa v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-01-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal appellate-procedure appellate-review civil-procedure civil-procedure-rules due-process judicial-discretion prejudice prisoner prisoner-litigation prisoner-rights pro-se pro-se-litigant rule-4a6 time-limitation timeliness |
Did the District court and Appellate Court err in concluding that Mr. Pujayasa's Motion to Re-Open Time to File Appeal (6) motion, which was sent on F… |
| 19-7280 |
David Everett Jones v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-01-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
despite Petitioner's diligent efforts to timely f -civil-procedure aedpa aedpa-limitations civil-rights due-process eleventh-circuit equitable-tolling federal-habeas habeas-corpus procedural-default standing state-post-conviction statute-of-limitations timeliness |
To whether Jones' successful Florida Claim 23-80 motion created a new judgment, sufficient to restart his one-year statute of limitations and Effectiv… |
| 19-7256 |
Joseph Eugene Osborne v. Pelicia Hall, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-01-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
actual-innocence aedpa aedpa-statute-of-limitations civil-procedure civil-rights due-process factual-predicate habeas-corpus procedural-default statute-of-limitations timeliness |
1. Do suspicions trigger AEDPA's statute of limitations even if they would be insufficient to state a factual predicate for a claim under AEDPA?
2. E… |
| 19-7258 |
Jamal Marquise Collins v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-01-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review criminal-procedure holguin-hernandez judicial-review legal-standard objections remand sentencing timeliness timely-objection |
1. Whether parties to a criminal proceeding must make timely objections to the unreasonableness of a sentence?
Subsidiary question: whether the case … |
| 19-7162 |
Carlos Juan Negron v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-01-03 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure document-submission due-process filing habeas-corpus houston-v-lack judicial-procedure legal-filing prison prison-filing prisoner-rights statute-of-limitations timeliness |
Whether a document when placed in the hands of prison officials hands for mailing pursuant to Houston v. Lack . 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed… |
| 19-6832 |
James Henry Lacy, Jr. v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-12-03 |
Denied |
IFP |
18-usc-2113 18-usc-924 bank-robbery career-offender career-offender-guideline categorical-approach crime-of-violence criminal-law elements-clause federal-bank-robbery habeas-corpus johnson-v-united-states residual-clause section-2255 sentencing-guidelines timeliness |
1. Whether a § 2255 motion filed within one year of
Johnson v. United States, claiming that Johnson
invalidates the residual clause of the pre-Booker … |
| 19-6704 |
JB Foster McAfee v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-11-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-court circuit-court-rejection civil-procedure-mail-box-rule due-process federal-rules-appellate-procedure federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure habeas-corpus houston-v-lack mail-box-rule obstruction-of-justice prison-mail prisoner-appeals prisoner-petition sentencing-guidelines timeliness timely-filing |
Whether a prisoner's petition for rehearing of his appeal decision that is due in 14 days, is considered timely filed under the "mail box rule" and Ho… |
| 19-6686 |
Darren Kevin Hunter v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-11-20 |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2255 bank-robbery career-offender career-offender-guideline due-process elements-clause habeas-corpus-review johnson-ruling johnson-v-united-states residual-clause section-2255 sentencing timeliness timeliness-standard |
Whether a § 2255 motion filed within one year of Johnson v. United States, claiming that Johnson invalidates the residual clause of the pre-Booker car… |
| 19-6689 |
Frank Fernandez v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-11-20 |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2255 career-offender career-offender-guideline due-process johnson-v-united-states mandatory-guidelines pre-booker residual-clause section-2255 sentencing timeliness timeliness-purposes |
1. Whether a § 2255 motion filed within one year of Johnson v. United States, claiming that Johnson invalidates the residual clause of the pre-Booker … |
| 19-6658 |
Booker Terry Simmons v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-11-19 |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2255 career-offender career-offender-guideline civil-procedure constitutional-vagueness due-process johnson-v-united-states mandatory-guidelines residual-clause section-2255 sentencing timeliness |
1. Whether a § 2255 motion filed within one year of Johnson v. United States, claiming that Johnson invalidates the residual clause of the pre-Booker … |
| 19-6670 |
Michael Bridge v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-11-19 |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2255 appellate-procedure brief-formatting career-offender constitutional-rights due-process johnson-v-united-states judicial-discretion mandatory-guidelines procedural-fairness residual-clause sentencing-guidelines timeliness Whether Pennsylvania Superior Court can dismiss an |
1. Whether a § 2255 motion filed within one year of
Johnson v. United States, claiming that Johnson
invalidates the residual clause of the pre-Booker … |
| 19-6612 |
Jerome Small v. Pennsylvania |
Pennsylvania |
2019-11-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abuse-of-discretion brady-claim constitutional-procedure due-diligence judicial-discretion pcra-court-discretion plea-agreement prosecutorial-disclosure prosecutorial-misconduct timeliness |
Is their four (4) prongs to establishing a Brady claim ?
Is the burden on the defense to scavage for Brady material to
show due diligence ?
Is a Br… |
| 19-6483 |
Carl Robinson v. Bernadette Mason, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Retreat |
Third Circuit |
2019-11-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
14th-amendment civil-procedure clearly-erroneous-standard clearly-erroneous'-rule-52(a),exhaustion-of-remedi conviction court-of-appeals criminal-procedure due-process exhaustion-of-remedies judicial-independence judicial-procedure legal-remedy procedural-due-process standard-of-review statute supplemental-response timeliness unfairness Was the Petitioner denied due process of law,in vi |
1 This case presents the question when there's no authority in the Federal Court's that countenances the preparation of the opinion by the attorney fo… |
| 19-6142 |
Santo Leone v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-10-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abuse-of-discretion amendment categorical-approach civil-procedure district-court-discretion divisibility drug-convictions due-process first-step-act marijuana-convictions motion-to-amend prior-convictions section-851 standing timeliness |
Whether district court abused its discretion by concluding motion to amend should be denied as untimely?
Whether district court erred when failure to… |
| 19-6092 |
Jonothan E. Prather v. Robert Gilmore, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Greene, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2019-10-01 |
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment 8th-amendment constitutional-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment eighth-amendment equal-protection fourteenth-amendment juvenile-sentencing miller-v-alabama montgomery-v-louisiana petition-timeliness retroactivity timeliness |
I - The lower courts and the respondents claim that the Petitioner's petition is
untimely and should be dismissed as such.
II - The lower courts and … |
| 19-5748 |
Seth Mitchell v. Macy's, Inc., et al. |
Second Circuit |
2019-08-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights denial-of-motion disability-accommodation due-process employment-discrimination erisa federal-rules-of-civil-procedure first-amendment hipaa magistrate-judge motion-to-amend timeliness title-vii |
1. When, if ever, can a magistrate judge assigned to handle nondispositive matters in a Federal lawsuit intentionally violate Federal Rule of Civil Pr… |
| 19-5563 |
Ian Alexander Bowline v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2019-08-13 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review circuit-split criminal-procedure federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure plain-error plain-error-review pretrial-motions timeliness waiver |
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12 no longer provides that the consequence of not timely making a required, pretrial motion is a waiver. Can an app… |
| 19-5499 |
Marvel Thompson v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-08-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus habeas-corpus-review rule-60(b)(6) rule-60b6 seventh-circuit standard-of-review standards-of-review timeliness |
1. Whether The District Court And Seventh Circuit Court Of Appeals Erred When They Denied The Petitioner A Certificate Of Appealability Where. The Pet… |
| 19-5233 |
Martin Leyva Valdez, Jr. v. W. L. Montgomery, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-07-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
due-process federal-court-proceedings habeas-corpus ninth-circuit petition-timeliness rule-4 section-2254 state-court-proceedings state-court-records state-court-review timeliness ylst-v-nunnemaker |
(1) Is the Ninth Circuit's decision contrary to this Court's decision in Ylst v Nunnemaker because it failed to presume that the silent denial of his … |
| 18-9720 |
Frederick H. Banks v. United States |
Third Circuit |
2019-06-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeals appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-rights collateral-order-doctrine due-process jurisdiction standing timeliness |
Whether the Appeals Court erred in failing to find that the Courts lacked Subject matter Jurisdiction based on petitioners pro te informal brief of Ap… |
| 18-1395 |
Fraternal Order of Police Chicago Lodge No. 7 v. Illinois |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-05-06 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-procedure-intervention civil-rights consent-decree deception due-process intervention intervention-motion misrepresentation rule-24 statutory-rights timeliness timely-filing timely-intervention unrebutted-facts |
Whether a motion to intervene is timely when it is filed shortly after a would-be intervenor learns that the existing parties misrepresented that the … |
| 18-8904 |
Octavius Matthews v. Terry Ratliff (TR Motors) |
Alabama |
2019-04-18 |
Denied |
IFP |
appeal appeal-procedure appeals civil-procedure court-dismissal down-payment due-process jurisdiction legal-timeliness plaintiff-claim procedural-grounds standing statute-of-limitations timeliness |
Why did the courts find that the Appeal was improper, because the plaintiff did not do it right.
Why has the case been erroneous as of it being over … |
| 18-8551 |
Ikemefula Charles Ibeabuchi v. Arizona |
Arizona |
2019-03-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeals appellate-procedure civil-procedure-appeal civil-rights constitutional-rights court-of-appeals criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review jurisdiction legal-standard motion-for-relief self-representation standing timeliness |
Whether or not, the Court of Appeal, state of Arizona, Correctly denied Appellant's Motion To Dismiss, his Appeal, Submitted pursuant to Arizona Rules… |
| 18-8425 |
Henry Johnson Lucas, Jr. v. Virginia |
Virginia |
2019-03-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeals brady-violation civil-procedure civil-procedure-appeal-timeliness-dismissal-rules- constitutional-violation due-process evidence-suppression new-trial-motion procedural-error prosecutorial-misconduct rules-of-court standing timeliness |
Did the Virginia Supreme Court rule erroneously in dismissing netitioner's aDDeal as being untimely under Rule 5:9(a) of the Supreme Court of Virginia… |
| 18-8429 |
Tracy Lane Beatty v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-03-14 |
Denied |
IFP |
adequate-representation circuit-split civil-procedure civil-procedure-60b6-martinez-v-ryan-conflict-amon federal-courts federal-habeas martinez-standard martinez-v-ryan procedural-default rule-60-motion rule-60(b)(6) standing timeliness |
the federal courts of appeals as to whether petitioners may ever prevail on a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) motion premised, in part, on Ma… |
| 18-8344 |
James Edward Whitney v. Arkansas |
Arkansas |
2019-03-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal appeal-procedure appeal-process-issues civil-procedure clerk-error clerk-of-court clerk-of-court-duties court-filing due-process institutional-filing notice-of-appeal record record-filing record-lodging standing timeliness |
The Clerk of the court has improperly declined to lodge the record on my appeal from the order of the Circuit Court for Washington County Arkansas, ca… |
| 18-8212 |
Harry Brantley v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-03-01 |
Denied |
IFP |
appeals civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-convictions dismissal district-court due-process federal-review federal-rules-of-civil-procedure habeas-corpus petition-dismissal standing state-court timeliness |
Question not identified. |
| 18-8157 |
James Arthur Brinson v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-02-27 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-rights court-access due-process federal-courts federal-jurisdiction final-decision fraud fraud-on-court judicial-procedure state-court timeliness untimeliness |
IS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF ACCESS TO THE COURTS BEING DENED WHEN A FRAUD ON A STATE COURT DECISION IS USED TO PROVE UNTIMELINESS WHEN FEDERAL COURTS… |
| 18-8096 |
Antonio R. Hall v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-02-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure district-court houston-v-lack mailbox-rule notice-of-appeal pro-se timeliness timely-filing |
DOES THE PRESUMPTION OF TIMELINESS TO BE ACCORDED THE PETITIONER'S PRO SE NOTICE OF APPEAL UNDER THE "MAIL BOX" RULE OF HOUSTON v. LACK, 487 U.S. 266 … |
| 18-8098 |
In Re Christopher Hanson |
|
2019-02-22 |
Denied |
IFP |
due-process government-interference habeas-corpus pcra plea-agreement post-conviction-relief-act statutory-interpretation statutory-provisions timeliness |
WHETHER APPELLANT HANSON'S PCRA'S WERE TIMELY UNDER 42 Pa. C.S. § 9545(b) DUE TO GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE AND REFUSAL TO RELEASE DOCUMENTS.
WHETHER AP… |
| 18-1075 |
RPX Corporation v. Applications in Internet Time, LLC |
Federal Circuit |
2019-02-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
35-usc-314 35-usc-315 administrative-law inter-partes-review judicial-review patent-office-decision patent-review patent-review-procedure statutory-interpretation timeliness timeliness-objection |
Whether 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) bars judicial review of the Patent and Trademark Office's decision to institute inter partes review where a patent holder's… |
| 18-7963 |
Fredmun Wayne Reynolds v. Noah Nagy, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-02-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure district-court due-process habeas-corpus prisoner-rights procedural-rules rules-of-civil-procedure state-prisoner statute statute-interpretation timeliness |
DOES A DISTRICT COURT'S DISMISSAL OF A STATE PRISONER'S HABEAS PETITION UNDER HABEAS RULE 4, FOR LACK OF TIMELINESS, VIOLATE STATUTE, THE RULES OF CIV… |
| 18-7930 |
Richard S. Button v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-02-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
filing-date habeas-corpus legal-interpretation motion-amendment postconviction-relief procedural-rules relation-back standard-of-review state-law timeliness |
DO THE PROCEDURAL RULES IN EFFECT AT TIME OF FILING, GOVERN WHETHER AN APPLICATION FOR STATE POSTCONVICTION RELIEF IS PROPERLY FILED?
WHAT IS THE STA… |
| 18-7687 |
Dre'Shawn Markuise Lee v. William Muniz, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-01-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equitable-tolling habeas-corpus institutional-confinement pro-se state-court-appeals statute-of-limitations timeliness |
For an inmate confined in an institution in Prose wher does their Federal Habeas Petition clock begin tò run once the Supreme court of therr State has… |
| 18-7694 |
Raymond Crespo v. New York |
New York |
2019-01-31 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appeal criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process faretta-v-california judicial-discretion legal-timeliness pro-se-representation right-to-counsel right-to-self-representation self-representation timeliness |
"How soon in the criminal proceeding must a defendant decide between proceeding by counsel or pro se?" Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 852 (1975)… |
| 18-7177 |
Robert Joe Gonzales v. Kelly Santoro, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-12-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2244 chavis federal-habeas habeas-corpus ninth-circuit procedural-bar procedural-bars statute-of-limitations summary-denial timeliness |
This Court explained in Evans v. Chavis, 546 U.S. 189 (2006), that a habeas corpus petition filed in a California appellate court within 30 to 60 days… |
| 18-7026 |
Bryan Coats v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2018-12-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appeals civil-procedure civil-rights court-of-appeals due-process federal-courts government-action jurisdiction jurisdiction-filing legal-procedure order-denying-rehearing petition-for-rehearing rehearing standing takings timeliness united-states |
Question not identified. |
| 18-6940 |
Dalray Kwane Andrews v. Warren L. Montgomery, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-12-06 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review criminal-procedure dilatory faretta-right faretta-v-california habeas-corpus self-representation sixth-amendment timeliness trial-court |
(1) Did the Ninth Circuit err in holding that Faretta "clearly established," for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1), that a request for self-represent… |
| 18-6765 |
Bernard J. Bagdis v. United States |
Third Circuit |
2018-11-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2255 certiorari-review circuit-split due-process federal-procedure finality habeas-corpus rehearing statute-of-limitations timeliness |
Should the Supreme Court grant certiorari to resolve the differences in treatment among the various circuits and to clearly establish when a judgment … |
| 18-6661 |
Bryan Christopher Samuel v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2018-11-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure constitutional-issues court-of-appeals delayed-opinions due-process first-impression-issues habeas-corpus judicial-discretion jurisdiction jurisdictional-barriers jurisdictional-issues petition-for-certiorari petition-for-rehearing procedural-delay timeliness |
1. Whether the federal courts below, in attempts to avoid constitutional and jurisdictional issues in a habeas corpus-type case, abused their discreti… |
| 18-6477 |
Delmer M. Ackels v. Randy M. Olsen, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-10-30 |
Denied |
IFP |
answer civil-procedure court-of-appeals default-judgment excuse excuses jurisdiction procedural-rules timeliness timely-filing |
Whether the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction to deny a default judgment when the defendant was untimely with its Answer without an excuse. |
| 18-6291 |
Steven H. Cook v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-10-12 |
Rehearing |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
certificate-of-appealability civil-rights collateral-review deprivation-of-liberty due-process federal-law federal-mail-box-rule habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel liberty-deprivation mail-box-rule mailbox-rule standing timeliness |
-Is the issue 'j accordingly of great import to potentially thousand's of prisoners similarly situated and does if have significant impact on the publ… |
| 18-6281 |
Terry E. Callins v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2018-10-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
armed-career-criminal-act circuit-split collateral-review habeas-corpus mandatory-sentencing-guidelines residual-clause retroactivity sentencing-guidelines supreme-court-retroactivity teague-v-lane timeliness |
Did Mr. Callins file his § 2255 motion within one year of "the date on which the right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court," which … |
| 18-357 |
Dragomir Taskov v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-09-19 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
actual-innocence constitutional-rights due-process due-process,ineffective-assistance,innocence,prose habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-counsel prosecutorial-misconduct section-2255 statute-of-limitations timeliness |
Whether Petitioner's substantive claim of innocence and all the violations of his constitutional rights are barred simply as untimely and because of t… |
| 18-5674 |
Roger Clay Swain v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2018-08-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
armed-career-criminal-act career-offender collateral-review due-process federal-sentencing habeas-corpus johnson-ruling mandatory-sentencing-guidelines residual-clause retroactivity section-2255-motion sentencing-guidelines supreme-court-retroactivity timeliness |
Did Mr. Swain file his § 2255 motion within one year of "the date on which the right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court," which "h… |
| 18-5450 |
Amilcar Rivas-Rivera v. Pennsylvania |
Pennsylvania |
2018-08-07 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-counsel ineffective-assistance-of-counsel pcra plea-agreement post-conviction-relief prison-mailbox-rule standing state-law timeliness |
WHETHER THE PENNSYLVANIA LOWER COURT AND APPELLATE COURTS DECISION DISMISSING PETITIONER'S SECOND PRO SE PCRA PETITION AS UNTIMELY IS CONTRARY TO PENN… |
| 18-5461 |
Keith Henderson v. Minnesota |
Minnesota |
2018-08-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
due-process evidentiary-hearing innocence innocence-claim minnesota-supreme-court newly-discovered-evidence postconviction-relief state-district-court timeliness |
When a defendant has been denied an evidentiary hearing, has his right to due process been violated when the evidence he presented has to be construed… |
| 18-5356 |
Joaquin H. Ciria v. California |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-07-25 |
Denied |
IFP |
actual-innocence civil-procedure civil-procedure,fraud,rule-60(b),actual-innocence, fraud fraud-upon-court procedural-mechanism rule-60(b) rule-60b successive-petition timeliness |
IF A FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, RULE 60(b) MOTION ("Rule 60(b)") IS THE CORRECT PROCEDURE FOR RAISING CLAIMS OF FRAUD COMMITTED UPON THE COURT?… |
| 18-5310 |
Walter N. Rhodes, Jr. v. Shane Baker, Warden, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-07-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process exhaustion-of-remedies habeas-corpus jurisdiction standing statute-of-limitations statutory-interpretation timeliness |
Question not identified. |
| 18-5293 |
George Anthony Autobee v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2018-07-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-924c 28-usc-2255 armed-bank-robbery constitutional-challenge crime-of-violence felony-force-clause johnson-v-united-states residual-clause section-2255 statutory-interpretation timeliness |
1. Whether Mr. Autobee's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging the
constitutionality of the residual clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) was
timely because it … |
| 18-95 |
Kyrt M. Wentzell, et al. v. BP America, Incorporated, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2018-07-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-procedure-appeal deepwater-horizon dismissal due-process fifth-circuit judicial-discretion mdl-procedure multidistrict-litigation oil-spill procedural-compliance standing timeliness |
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the petitioners appeal to the Fifth Circuit was not timely filed. |
| 18-5207 |
Omar Montoya v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2018-07-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-3582 circumstances-beyond-control criminal-sentencing,sentencing-guidelines,abuse-of criminal-sentencing,sentencing-guidelines,sentenci discretion sentencing-guidelines sentencing-range timeliness |
Whether the District Court reversibly erred in Denying to Reduce and Appropriate Outcome when the Subsequent Sentencing Range has been Lowered by the … |
| 18-5147 |
Edward Nathan Wing v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2018-07-06 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
18-usc-924(c) 18-usc-924c 28-usc-2255 crime-of-violence habeas-corpus-review johnson-v-united-states residual-clause retroactivity timeliness |
1. Whether Mr. Wing's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging the constitutionality of the residual clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) was timely because it was… |
| 18-5057 |
James T. Bagby v. William Hyatte, Warden |
Seventh Circuit |
2018-06-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
7th-circuit-court 7th-circuit-court-of-appeals certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equitable-tolling habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance post-conviction-relief prosecutorial-misconduct timeliness |
Did the United States 7th Circuit Court of Appeals err in denying a certificate of appealability without specifically addressing any of Bagbys' claims… |
| 18-5058 |
Deante Drake, aka Panama, aka Shawn, aka Papa Bear v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2018-06-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appeal-timeliness appellate-procedure court-of-appeals criminal-procedure-rule-18-usc-3742-f-1-a en-banc-review federal-rules-criminal-procedure federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure first-amendment incoming-prison-mail legal-mail-delays mandamus-or-certiorari petition-clause rehearing-en-banc statutory-construction timeliness |
Whether when a Fed.R.Crim.P. 18 U.S.C. § 3742(f)(1).(A) Brief is. filed for rehearing en banc, that the Court of Appeals governed under Fed.R.App.P. 4… |