No. 19-5563
Ian Alexander Bowline v. United States
Tags: appellate-review circuit-split criminal-procedure federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure plain-error plain-error-review pretrial-motions timeliness waiver
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (from Petition)
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12 no longer provides that the consequence of not timely making a required, pretrial motion is a waiver. Can an appellate court review a defense, objection, or request that is not timely made under Rule 12 for plain error, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an appellate court can review a defense, objection, or request that is not timely made under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12 for plain error, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b)
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-12
Reply of petitioner Ian Bowline filed. (Distributed)
2020-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-15
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-12-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 15, 2020.
2019-12-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 16, 2019 to January 15, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-11-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 16, 2019.
2019-11-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 14, 2019 to December 16, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-10-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 14, 2019.
2019-10-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 15, 2019 to November 14, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-09-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 15, 2019.
2019-09-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 12, 2019 to October 15, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-08-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 12, 2019)
2019-05-30
Application (18A1239) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until August 7, 2019.
2019-05-28
Application (18A1239) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 9, 2019 to August 7, 2019, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Ian Bowline
Howard A. Pincus — Fed Pub. Def. for Dist. CO &WY, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent