No. 19-7785
Jacob Daniel Wolf v. Suzanne M. Peery, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure criminal-appeal due-process evidentiary-hearing habeas-petition post-conviction-relief statutory-tolling time-barred timeliness
Latest Conference:
2020-04-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the district court properly grant Respondent's motion to dismiss Wolf's habeas petition as time-barred where Respondent conceded that Wolf was entitled to a substantial period of statutory tolling and the record shows that Wolf's petition was timely under other tolling theories or at least demonstrated that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing to further establish that his petition was timely filed?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the district court properly grant Respondent's motion to dismiss Wolfs habeas petition as time-barred?
Docket Entries
2020-04-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.
2020-04-03
Waiver of right of respondent Suzanne M. Peery, Warden to respond filed.
2020-02-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 27, 2020)
Attorneys
Jacob Wolf
Tracy Casadio — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Suzanne M. Peery, Warden
Amanda Victoria Lopez — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent