Zachary R. E. Rusk v. Fidelity Brokerage Services
1. Did the 1 Oth circuit apply the law incorrectly?
2. Did the 1 Oth Circuit fail to consider evidence and pleadings that show that Petitioner did present all necessary information for a favorable decision?
3. Did the 1 Oth Circuit and US District Court of Utah 's judges interfere with this case by delaying purposefully and making false statements?
4. Is there an issue with the ability of Petitioner to be timely in his Rule 11 motion?
5. Was jurisdiction lost as to the US District Court to consider a rule 11 motion within the time frame which is allegedly required, when Rusk filed his original rule 60 motion, and appealed to the USSSC and then the I Oth Circuit as directed by this court?
6. Did these courts unduly delay and cause the issue with timelines to occur through judicial interference?
Did the 10th circuit apply the law incorrectly?