Whether the Justice system (The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit) granting the Motion to Reopen to one party after 8 years from the final judgment, and denying the Motion to Reopen the same case to another party after just 7 months be justifiable?

Whether the discriminating treatment of the Justice System (The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit) between a wealthy party with a legal team of huge law firm against a poor party without any legal counsel be justifiable?

Whether the Justice system (The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit) granting the Motion to Reopen to one party after 8 years from the final judgment, and denying the Motion to Reopen the same case to another party after just 7 months be justifiable?