No. 21-7294
Daniel Gerard Lacey v. Brian M. Gootkin, Director, Montana Department of Corrections, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certiorari circuit-split foreshadowing ineffective-assistance judicial-review jurisdiction legal-doctrine timeliness writ-of-certiorari
Latest Conference:
2022-03-25
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether this Court should grant certiorari so that it can address and resolve a circuit split between the Ninth and the Second, Sixth and Seventh Circuits on the doctrine of foreshadowing and its application to ineffective assistance claims?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Court should grant certiorari to address and resolve a circuit split on the doctrine of foreshadowing and its application to ineffective assistance claims
Docket Entries
2022-03-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
2022-03-08
Waiver of right of respondent Brian M. Gootkin, Director, Montana Department of Corrections, et. al. to respond filed.
2022-02-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 6, 2022)
Attorneys
Brian M. Gootkin, Director, Montana Department of Corrections, et. al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Daniel Lacey
David Foster Ness — Attorney at Law, Petitioner