Ralph Stephen Gambina v. United States
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
1. Whether a § 2255 motion filed within one year of
Johnson v. United States, claiming that Johnson
invalidates the residual clause of the pre-Booker
career offender guideline, asserts a "right...
initially recognized" in Johnson for timeliness
purposes under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(8).
2. Whether federal bank robbery and extortion under
18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d) be a crime of violence
under the elements clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A),
where the offense fails to require any intentional
use, attempted use, or threat of violent physical
force?
Whether a § 2255 motion filed within one year of Johnson v. United States, claiming that Johnson invalidates the residual clause of the pre-Booker career offender guideline, asserts a 'right... initially recognized' in Johnson for timeliness purposes under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(8)