No. 18-1075
RPX Corporation v. Applications in Internet Time, LLC
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: 35-usc-314 35-usc-315 administrative-law inter-partes-review judicial-review patent-office-decision patent-review patent-review-procedure statutory-interpretation timeliness timeliness-objection
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) bars judicial review of the Patent and Trademark Office's decision to institute inter partes review where a patent holder's challenge to that institution decision is grounded on a timeliness objection under § 315(b).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) bars judicial review of the Patent and Trademark Office's decision to institute inter partes review where a patent holder's challenge to that institution decision is grounded on a timeliness objection under § 315(b)
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-13
Supplemental brief of petitioner RPX Corporation filed. (Distributed)
2019-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-20
Waiver of right of respondent Applications in Internet Time, LLC to respond filed.
2019-02-19
Motion (18M100) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal Granted.
2019-01-30
MOTION (18M100) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-22
Motion (18M100) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.
2019-01-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 21, 2019)
Attorneys
Applications in Internet Time, LLC
Steven C. Sereboff — SoCal IP Law Group LLP, Respondent
RPX Corporation
Gregory G. Garre — Latham & Watkins LLP, Petitioner