No. 18-7687

Dre'Shawn Markuise Lee v. William Muniz, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-01-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equitable-tolling habeas-corpus institutional-confinement pro-se state-court-appeals statute-of-limitations timeliness
Latest Conference: 2019-03-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

For an inmate confined in an institution in Prose wher does their Federal Habeas Petition clock begin tò run once the Supreme court of therr State has denied their state habeas Petitionn The day the habeas petition was denied or the day the petitioner received the rualing in the mail from a third party carrier?

If a petitioner is an inmate Confined in an institution proceeding in pro se are they qualified for equitable tolling for the number of days it takes a third party carrier to deliver a courts decision to said petitioner?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

When does the federal habeas petition clock begin to run for an inmate confined in an institution after the state supreme court has denied their state habeas petition?

Docket Entries

2019-03-18
Petition DENIED. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2019-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-15
Waiver of right of respondent Muniz, Warden to respond filed.
2018-12-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 4, 2019)

Attorneys

Dre'Shawn Lee
Dre'Shawn Markuise Lee — Petitioner
Greg Lewis
Allen R. CrownOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent