1* JtA.i.-bb«. Served ijKe^ ' 1~ke
)-f's order
S| fcce "flte rwo'floh K^A-S snUrwiH^d feM.es «.ppe.|(«.n.'f' five
opp^r-fi** rfy "t^ ^utUe ^ A-f*pl' « c«cHo* 4® ejr4*MaJ fiM-*- 4t»
•f>r IreUe^r ?Cour't' of A-ppe^|s doe£ kjo't issue,
passed~R-AK 4t I 0 0 kvvohITiS k^iv c uw MOrt
*S U !•>,»* Vf" efi'h**r
Xs ju.£fiee, de/hie-f uJhew 'TUe Con-ct" of A-ppec»( foes vl©"|~ ccl(
appg ((«Uv'f" lutv/e a. Copy / -fy-av^Scn pf or fi.14.f10 o-f- /'ivrc.
Or* lL. OOJ
O-PpfcRex'H') - l< Ko't" pe/M 'l44ef 4®* ecRe^ul ^ en"hs c^keretf.r jum
fent«d of <a- recall rcM'i+flfwr O-la 6^"fevi<declD©<» s 3.
(over eleven GO mowfks) Imposes n due process
Uec<u/se, if */sO tn
q.K (mpef'^W -fz Sezfctuj fii^li-fy
*K 4pphe*rhoH cr*e\hU. IIm
Co (A H"S C'-nf l»u pedes 44sfnfe" ?

Whether the Court of Appeals' failure to issue its order for over 11 months and then denying the appellant the opportunity to file a petition for rehearing denies the appellant due process