No. 19-8219
Juan Gilberto Medrano v. Scott Frauenheim, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure equitable-tolling extraordinary-circumstance extraordinary-circumstances federal-habeas federal-petition habeas-corpus legal-question ninth-circuit timeliness
Latest Conference:
2020-05-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
(1) Was Petitioner's 2016 Petition filed in a timely manner?
(2) Does the dismissal of a protective federal habeas petition prior to the decision in Mena v. Long, 813 F.3d 907 (9th Cir. 2016)("Mena") constitute an extraordinary circumstance sufficient to warrant equitable tolling?
(3) Is "purely a question of law" presented by the issue of whether dismissal of a protective federal habeas petition pre-Mena constitutes an extraordinary circumstance sufficient to warrant equitable tolling?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Petitioner's 2016 Petition filed in a timely manner?
Docket Entries
2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-15
Waiver of right of respondent Scott Frauenheim, Warden to respond filed.
2020-03-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 8, 2020)
Attorneys
Juan Gilberto Medrano
Jan Norman — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Scott Frauenheim, Warden