No. 18-6281
Terry E. Callins v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act circuit-split collateral-review habeas-corpus mandatory-sentencing-guidelines residual-clause retroactivity sentencing-guidelines supreme-court-retroactivity teague-v-lane timeliness
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2018-11-09
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did Mr. Callins file his § 2255 motion within one year of "the date on which the right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court," which "has been newly recognized by the Supreme Court and made retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review"? 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(3).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. Callins filed his § 2255 motion within one year of the date on which the right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court
Docket Entries
2018-11-13
Petition DENIED. Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Ginsburg joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent for the reasons set out in Brown v. United States, 586 U. S. ___ (2018) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
2018-11-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018.
2018-10-30
Rescheduled.
2018-10-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
2018-10-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 9, 2018)
Attorneys
Terry E. Callins
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent