No. 18-7963
Fredmun Wayne Reynolds v. Noah Nagy, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure district-court due-process habeas-corpus prisoner-rights procedural-rules rules-of-civil-procedure state-prisoner statute statute-interpretation timeliness
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
DOES A DISTRICT COURT'S DISMISSAL OF A STATE PRISONER'S HABEAS PETITION UNDER HABEAS RULE 4, FOR LACK OF TIMELINESS, VIOLATE STATUTE, THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, AND THE HISTORICAL PRACTICE OF HABEAS CORPUS?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a district court's dismissal of a state prisoner's habeas petition under Habeas Rule 4 for lack of timeliness violate statute, the Rules of Civil Procedure, and the historical practice of habeas corpus?
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-11
Waiver of right of respondent Noah Nagy, Warden to respond filed.
2019-01-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 18, 2019)
Attorneys
Fredmun Wayne Reynolds
Fredmun Reynolds — Petitioner
Noah Nagy, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent