1. Did the Ninth Circuit err in holding that the California Supreme Court's
summary denial of a habeas petition as untimely is beyond review by
federal courts, even when the petitioner argues that the state court's
application of its timeliness rules was unreasonable and inconsistent?

2. Does the rule of lenity apply to state habeas corpus petitions under
AEDPA when a petitioner argues that state procedural rules are applied in
an arbitrary and capricious manner?

Did the Ninth Circuit err in holding that the California Supreme Court's summary denial of a habeas petition as untimely is beyond review by federal courts, even when the petitioner argues that the state court's application of its timeliness rules was unreasonable and inconsistent?