No. 18-5147
Edward Nathan Wing v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 18-usc-924(c) 18-usc-924c 28-usc-2255 crime-of-violence habeas-corpus-review johnson-v-united-states residual-clause retroactivity timeliness
Latest Conference:
2019-01-04
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether Mr. Wing's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging the constitutionality of the residual clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) was timely because it was filed within one year of Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015);
2. Whether the offense of aggravated assault on a federal officer, 18 U.S.C. § 111(a) & (b) (2006) is a crime of violence.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. Wing's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging the constitutionality of the residual clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) was timely because it was filed within one year of Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015)
Docket Entries
2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-13
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2018-10-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 13, 2018.
2018-10-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 11, 2018 to November 13, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-09-11
Response Requested. (Due October 11, 2018)
2018-07-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2018)
Attorneys
Nathan E. Wing
Meredith Esser — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent