rules-of-court
11 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24-6547 | Mitchell S. Sanderson v. Janne Myrdal, et al. | North Dakota | 2025-02-12 | Denied | IFP | due-process judicial-oath jurisdiction rules-of-court service-of-process supremacy-clause | Whether the Rules of Court must be followed by the Court. The Walsh District Court violated Rules of Court on the 21-day default judgment. ND Supreme … |
| 23-7769 | In Re Johnny Smith | 2024-06-20 | Denied | Relisted (2)IFP | bar-ethics court-rules criminal-procedure due-process indictment judicial-discretion judicial-misconduct legal-procedure prosecutorial-misconduct rule-of-court rules-of-court | 1) WHY DOES A DEFENDANT/PETITIONER AFTER DENIAL OF APPEAL UNDER 3.850 AS FILED IN FEDERAL COURT ALL UNDER HABEAS CORPUS IS WARRANT? 2) PROSECUTOR DEL… | |
| 23-5643 | In Re Gregory Mercer | 2023-09-22 | Denied | Relisted (2)IFP | appellate-jurisdiction assignments-of-error constitutional-rights due-process mandamus mandamus-writ procedural-rules rules-of-court supremacy-clause supreme-court-procedure | a) Whether or not the Court of Appeals of Virginia ("COAV ") impeded the Appellate Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Virginia ("SCV ") and/or the … | |
| 22-7334 | In Re Quincetta Y. Cargill | 2023-04-20 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | civil-rights due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance institutional-conditions intellectual-disability legal-appeal medical-treatment mental-health procedural-challenges rules-of-court standing | 1. Where petitioner has zero resources and zero assets to be liquidated showing zero probability of risk of flight, why not release her so she could f… | |
| 22-5118 | Bejan David Etemad v. North Dakota | North Dakota | 2022-07-18 | Denied | IFP | civil-procedure due-process judicial-review rules-of-court standing state-courts | 1) Can North Dakota Supreme Court abrogate their own rules? Specifically Rule 24 (see appendix page 5). 2) Does the United States Supreme Court have… |
| 21-7362 | Kyle Kurtz v. David W. Gray, Warden | Sixth Circuit | 2022-03-14 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | civil-rights due-process ex-post-facto free-speech habeas-corpus prosecutorial-misconduct reasonable-doubt rules-of-court self-defense | Are the rules promulgated by the United States Supreme Court not being enforced by the judges representing the Kingdom of Judah or are the law enforce… |
| 20-6901 | Antonio Sierra v. Jack Daneri, et al. | Pennsylvania | 2021-01-15 | Denied | IFP | 4th-amendment civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process fourth-amendment habeas-corpus rules-of-court standing state-court-error unreasonable-seizure | Whether petitioner sufficiently asserted federal rights in the case being heard by state courts who defeated by rules of court, in error, petitioner's… |
| 19-8685 | In Re Gigi Fairchild-Littlefield | 2020-06-12 | Denied | Relisted (2)IFP | attorney-duties civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus legal-procedure rules-of-court standing state-attorney-general writ-of-certiorari | 1. When a State Attorney General has been admitted Admission To The Bar of This Court, and has Signed an Oath of Office monic, AS Sopport The Constitu… | |
| 19-5850 | Yurie Yamano v. Hawaii State Judiciary, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2019-09-06 | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | article-vi civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law court-rules due-process judicial-misconduct procedural-irregularity rules-of-court separation-of-powers standing stare-decisis | 1. Whether the Court should resolve the following questions for which the five judges on the State of Hawaii Supreme Court bench are exhibiting and c… |
| 18-8444 | Primo C. Novero v. Duke Energy Florida, LLC, et al. | Eleventh Circuit | 2019-03-19 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | access-to-courts administrative-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-claims document-delivery due-process equal-access equal-protection right-to-jury-trial right-to-petition rules-of-court standing trial-by-jury | Does the district court erred and had conflict with the U.S. Supreme Court Rule 29.2, and U.S. Constitution Amendment 14 due proces in defining "timel… |
| 18-8425 | Henry Johnson Lucas, Jr. v. Virginia | Virginia | 2019-03-14 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | appeals brady-violation civil-procedure civil-procedure-appeal-timeliness-dismissal-rules- constitutional-violation due-process evidence-suppression new-trial-motion procedural-error prosecutorial-misconduct rules-of-court standing timeliness | Did the Virginia Supreme Court rule erroneously in dismissing netitioner's aDDeal as being untimely under Rule 5:9(a) of the Supreme Court of Virginia… |