No. 22-7334

In Re Quincetta Y. Cargill

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2023-04-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance institutional-conditions intellectual-disability legal-appeal medical-treatment mental-health procedural-challenges rules-of-court standing
Latest Conference: 2023-06-08
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Where petitioner has zero resources and zero assets to be liquidated showing zero probability of risk of flight, why not release her so she could find and be given assistance to an appeals attorney?

2. Where the petitioner represented herself and raised relevant and specific material issues and concerns for appeal, would not release pending appeal allow her to timely explain her methodology or idea to counsel?

3. Where the institution at which the petitioner is housed is located approx. 2,800 miles from the Appointed appellate team and attorney, would not release make steps viable for better communication for the two to converse?

4. Where the B.O.P. has internal problems that include inadequate medical reach, psychology, treatment with the inmates to ANAS, and is in need of you would not release how can attorney afford such costly be conducted?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Where petitioner has been denied showing a probability of success on the merits

Docket Entries

2023-06-12
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-03-28
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 22, 2023)

Attorneys

Cargill, In Re
Quincetta Y. Cargill — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent