1. Whether the District Court abused discretion and obstructed justice in denying the existence of arguments and facts recited in the complaint refusing to even acknowledge invocations of §§1331 and 1338(a) refusing to answer entirety of the Petitioner's Brief in Opposition invoking this Court's precedents?

2. Whether the District Court abused discretion and obstructed justice in ruling lack of subject matter jurisdiction on "civil actions arising under the Constitution [Art.I.S8.C8], laws [§1338(a] and §145], or treaties of the United States [PCT]" as per 28 U.S.C. § 1331, for damages and/or Takings claims?

3. Whether the USPTO, an agency engaged in business with the public, is immune to damages and jury trial, unlike private enterprises in violation of FHA v. Burr; 309 U.S. 242, 245 (1940), particularly when the agency invades federally protected patent rights in extreme bad faith?

4. Whether the District Court obstructed justice in requiring more than a short/plain statement of the claim showing the pleader is entitled to relief and prejudged the outcome by dismissing the causes of action before deliberating on complete facts from discovery and trial?

Whether the District Court abused discretion and obstructed justice