No. 21-7810

Michael Geoffrey Peters v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-05-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: due-process fifth-amendment land-use property-rights regulatory-takings takings-clause
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)

SHOULD THE FIFTH CIRCUIT BE ABLE TO OVERRULE THE NINETH CIRCUIT'S RULING STATING: ("DEPRIVATIONS OF FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS DO NOT TRIGGER STRICT SCRUTINY UNDER 42 U.S.C. § 1983 DEPRIVATIONS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT A PRISONER TO REFERENCES CHIEF ASIDE ANY POSSIBILITY FROM CACI, TO INJURYINMENTAL EMOTIONAL OCCURRED"), 5th CIRCUIT REFORM ACT.

SHOULD THE TEXAS PRISON SYSTEM BE ACCOUNTED TO DENY FREEDOM OF RELIGIOUS EXERCISE GRANTING 1770 ACL OTHERS?

SHOULD DEFENDANTS GOLDSTEIN, CARAROFF AND CHABAD OUTREACH THE CLAIM "NON-JEWS" TO PARTICIPATE IN JEWISH SERVICES THE KOSHER WORK IN AND KITCHEN AND THEIR REFUSAL ALL FREEDOM OF RELIGIOUS EXERCISE DO SAME?

SHOULD THE STATE BE TO TEXAS RETALIATE AGAINST ME FOR EXPOSITIONS REPUBLICAN PARTY CRIMES MENTIONED COLLISION NO. USCA5H SHE SUPREME COURT AND ALL BRIEF 19-20717 OR FIFTH CIRCUIT AND STOP MY FREEDOM TO EXERCISE RELIGIOUS RIGHTS BY DENYING ME ACL SERVICES, RELIGIOUS CELEBRATION AND LESSONS.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment prohibits the government from requiring a property owner to dedicate a public easement as a condition of obtaining a permit to develop private property

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2022-06-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-04-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 8, 2022)

Attorneys

Michael G. Peters
Michael G. Peters — Petitioner