1.) On what grounds does Missouri continue
to deny the fundamental civil rights of a whole class
of people, namely people living with Brain Injury, who
try to navigate the Missouri Judicial System with their
particular legal efforts?

2.) How does Missouri, in providing no
accommodation specifically to the needs and challenges of
people living with Brain Injury due to their Brain Injuries,
at all and any points of contact with the Missouri Judicial
System, not deny the Brain Injured Community therein,
fair access to the Courts and fair rule of law in its Missouri
jurisdictions, given the nature of cognitive impairments
that are medically, and scientifically recognized, and
at the Federal level recognized, to be associated with
disability from Brain Injury?

3.) How is denying a Brain-Injured Individual any
accommodation specifically to their needs and challenges
living with Brain Injury due to their Brain Injuries, and
effectively closing the doors of Missouri's Courts and
Justice System therein shut to them by making the matter
of timing, deadlines, scheduled appointments and statute
of limitations, essentially a series of eligibility barriers to
people living with Brain Injury, of a non-Brain-Injured
standard of timing to have fair access to the Courts
and the rule of law therein, not a violation of the most
fundamental of civil rights in the United States, and the
fundamental civil rights of that Brain-Injured individual,
so treated by Missouri?

4.) How can the State of Missouri and other
Missouri Public Entities' be allowed to violate numerous
Federal Laws and the US Constitution and that most
fundamental of US civil rights, namely the fair access to
the Courts of the land and the fair rule of law, in those
Missouri Public Entities' maintenance and enforcement
of an endemic system of disability discrimination against
an entire class of people of the Brain-Injured Community
and their families by association by means of providing no
accommodation specifically to the needs and challenges of
people living with Brain Injury due to their brain injuries,
at any and all points of contact with the Missouri Judicial
System?

5.) How can Federal Courts ignore the segregation
upon segregation upon segregation of an entire class of
people based on that people's particular disability, namely
Brain Injury and in the case of Robert Michael Goldberg,
Anoxic Brain Injury, within Missouri and within American
civil society therein as Missouri and other Missouri Public
Entities' maintenance and enforcement of an endemic
system of disability discrimination against the BrainInjured Community and their families by association, and
as relates to that most fundamental of US civil rights,
namely fair access to the Courts of the land and the fair
rule of law?

6.) When the State Judicial Systems and their
Courts continue to shape and set medical policies, and blur
the line of their jurisdiction, do they not then, effectively
serve as Health Care Systems, that provide and deny
health care, how can they not also be held accountable
for their health care decisions as such organizations, in
their turn, when those other Health Care Systems and
organizations would be penalized for the same decisions
when they are in transgression of Federal Laws?

7.) Is not the 224 Circuit Court of the City of
St. Louis, Missouri, to which Robert Dierker was a
member and an individual of, in the times of question
of the Petitioner's original civil motion, an association
of individuals, and therefore a holder of rights, as
Bush v. Gore holds, but like any individual, a holder of
responsibilities and consequences of their actions from
them as well, including transgressions such as freely

On what grounds does Missouri continue to deny the fundamental civil rights of people living with Brain Injury in the Missouri Judicial System?