No. 24-6311

Shariff Butler, et al. v. Laurel R. Harry, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2025-01-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: court-of-appeals due-process judicial-bias precedential-decisions pro-se-litigants supreme-court-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment Punishment Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-05-15 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether A Judicial Bias has Occurred By Way of Court Appeals Panel Receiving Favors and/or Bribes From Parties With Cases Before Said Judges of Which Departs From Accepted and Usual Course of Judicial Proceedings Violating Substantive Due Process Calling For U.S. Supreme Court Supervisory Power?

Whether The Court of Appeals Final Decision Conflicts With Precedential Decisions Within Their Circuit, Our Sister Circuits and The United States Supreme Court Resulting In An Abuse of Discretion?

Whether The Court of Appeals Panel Decision Failed To Adhere To Applying The Applicable Law To Pro Se Litigants Requirement Irrespective of Whether They've Mentioned it By Name?

Whether The Court of Appeals Panel Decision Conflicts With Stipulations Defining the Continuing Violation Doctrine's Last Emission In The Face of A Duty to Act And The Applicable Time Between Post-Injury And Pre-Grievance Being Tolled By Statutory Prohibition And Equitable Tolling?

Whether The Court of Appeals Panel Decision Conflicts With The Facts Documented on Record Permitting A Standing Claim To Proceed and Establishments For Standing Acceptance via U.S. Supreme Court Precedent Cases?

Whether The Court of Appeals Panel Decision Ignored and Conflicts With Precedential Decisions Establishing What Constitutes An Eighth Amendment Violation And What Establishes Sufficient Evidence TO Support Said Violations?

Whether The Court of Appeals Panel Decision Conflicts With Precedential Decisions Establishing Sufficient Grounds To Sustain A Retaliation Claim Showing Adverse Action And Causation?

Whether The Court of Appeals Panel Decision Conflicts With Precedential Decisions Establishing A Justice-Required Amendment Given To Unrepresented Pro Se Litigants Under Extraordinary Circumstances?

Whether The Court of Appeals Panel Decision Conflicts With Precedential Decisions Establishing Sufficient Grounds For Seeking A Breach of Contract Claim?

Whether The Court of Appeals Panel Decision Overlooks Precedential Decisions Establishing Parties For Failure TO Comply With Discovery Requested And The Court's Discovery Orders?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether judicial bias, potential bribery, and conflicts with precedential decisions constitute grounds for Supreme Court review of Court of Appeals panel decisions

Docket Entries

2025-05-19
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-04-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2025.
2025-03-15
2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-02-04
Waiver of Harry, Sec., PA DOC, et al. of right to respond submitted.
2025-02-04
Waiver of right of respondent Harry, Sec., PA DOC, et al. to respond filed.
2025-01-13
Application (24A667) to file a writ of certiorari in excess of page limits granted by Justice Alito. The petition for a writ of certiorari may not exceed 44 pages.
2024-09-27
Application (24A667) to file a writ of certiorari in excess of page limits, submitted to Justice Alito.
2024-09-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 14, 2025)
2024-08-07
Application (24A137) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until September 26, 2024.
2024-07-30
Application (24A137) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 12, 2024 to September 26, 2024, submitted to Justice Alito.

Attorneys

Harry, Sec., PA DOC, et al.
Sean Andrew KirkpatrickOffice of the Attorney General of the Commonwealth, Respondent
Shariff Butler, et al.
Shariff Butler — Petitioner