No. 23-801

Richard George, et al. v. Triton Property Investments, LLC

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2024-01-24
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights contract-clause due-process equal-protection judicial-bias pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigants seventh-amendment state-courts
Latest Conference: 2024-03-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the empirical evidence of bias against, otherwise identically situated, pro se litigants in state courts proves the judicial intent to discriminate in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause.

Whether refusal to give standard jury instructions central to a defendant's case violates the Seventh Amendment Right to Trial by Jury and the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause.

Whether the California Tenant Protection Act that purportedly authorizes a landlord to terminate a lease agreement for "just cause" violates the Constitution's Article I sec. 10—Contract Clause when applied to leases that were in place prior to the act taking effect.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the empirical evidence of bias against, otherwise identically situated, pro se litigants in state courts proves the judicial intent to discriminate in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause

Docket Entries

2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-02-02
Waiver of right of respondent Trinton Property Investments, LLC to respond filed.
2024-01-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 23, 2024)

Attorneys

Richard George, et al.
Richard George — Petitioner
Trinton Property Investments, LLC
Nicolas A. FlegelJorgenson, Siegel, McClure & Flegel, LLP, Respondent