| 23-506 |
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v. Andes Petroleum Ecuador Limited |
Second Circuit |
Granted |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
arbitration circuit-split commonwealth-coatings disclosure disclosure-requirement evident-partiality federal-arbitration-act judicial-precedent second-circuit |
Whether an arbitrator's failure to disclose a relationship evinces evident partiality if it shows the arbitrator "might reasonably be thought biased,"… |
14.0 |
| 23-450 |
M. C., et vir v. Indiana Department of Child Services |
Indiana |
Denied |
Amici (4)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
14th-amendment child-custody due-process first-amendment free-exercise free-speech parental-rights prior-restraint |
M.C. and J.C. are devout Christians who believe that God creates each person as immutably male or female and that, based on those beliefs and scientif… |
13.5 |
| 23-562 |
McDonald's USA, LLC, et al. v. Leinani Deslandes, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (2) |
antitrust antitrust-law cross-market-effects horizontal-component horizontal-restraints intrabrand-restraint market-competition per-se-rule rule-of-reason sherman-act |
"The rule of reason is the accepted standard for testing whether a practice restrains trade in violation" of the Sherman Act. Leegin Creative Leather … |
12.5 |
| 23-696 |
Colorado Republican State Central Committee v. Norma Anderson, et al. |
Colorado |
Dismissed |
Amici (3)Response Waived |
14th-amendment disqualification-clause due-process election-law first-amendment fourteenth-amendment insurrection political-parties presidential-eligibility section-3 state-authority |
The Supreme Court of Colorado held that states possess authority, regardless of the lack of congressional authorization, to determine that a president… |
11.5 |
| 23-279 |
Couy Griffin v. New Mexico, ex rel. Marco White, et al. |
New Mexico |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
14th-amendment civil-rights congress congressional-power constitutional-interpretation due-process enforcement first-amendment fourteenth-amendment insurrection judicial-authority standing |
I. Whether Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution exclusively reserves the power to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment,… |
9.5 |
| 23-446 |
Junjie Li v. Rhode Island |
Rhode Island |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
4th-amendment civil-rights decriminalization drug-enforcement fourth-amendment marijuana-odor probable-cause reasonable-suspicion search-and-seizure traffic-stop |
Whether the slight odor of marijuana coming from within a car stopped for a passenger's seatbelt violation, in a state where possession of one ounce o… |
9.0 |
| 23-509 |
John Doe v. Rollins College |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
circuit-split doe-v-purdue procedural-deficiencies sex-discrimination summary-judgment title-ix |
1. Should this Court resolve the conflict among the Circuits as to the proper test for sex discrimination under 20 U.S.C. § 1681 in Title IX of the Ed… |
9.0 |
| 23-859 |
Zachary S. Spiegel v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
attempted-enticement circuit-split criminal-law criminal-statute free-speech mandatory-sentencing obscene-speech obscenity sentencing statutory-interpretation substantial-step |
Does speech alone (even obscene speech or "explicit sex talk") constitute the "substantial step" for a charge of attempted enticement of a minor to en… |
8.5 |
| 23-907 |
Pablo Pastrana v. New York |
New York |
Denied |
Response Waived |
brown-vs-texas constitutional-law fourth-amendment law-enforcement police-roadblocks probable-cause reasonable-suspicion roadblock search-and-seizure |
Whether a vehicular roadblock satisfies the standard for a reasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment, articulated in Brown v. Texas, 44… |
8.5 |
| 23-738 |
Leasa Marie Wright v. City of Ponca City, Oklahoma, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
|
civil-rights civil-rights-violation discovery due-process emergency-medical-care medical-negligence municipal-liability qualified-immunity spinal-cord-injury substantive-due-process |
1. Is it a violation of substantive due process for state medical personnel to actively and affirmatively inflict injury on a patient?
2. Is it an ob… |
5.5 |
| 23-739 |
Jodi A. Schwendimann, fka Jodi A. Dalvey v. Neenah, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
|
35-usc-103 federal-circuit-review ksr-standard ksr-v-teleflex obviousness patent-law primary-reference prior-art wbip-v-kohler yeda-v-mylan |
In conducting an obviousness analysis under 35 U.S.C. § 103, did the Federal Circuit err in holding that there "is no basis in our case law" for requi… |
5.5 |
| 23-748 |
Langston Austin, et al. v. Glynn County, Georgia, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
|
11th-amendment circuit-split eleventh-amendment eleventh-circuit employment-law fair-labor-standards-act individual-liability public-officials state-officials |
This case presents a clear conflict among the circuit courts regarding the interpretation of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et… |
5.5 |
| 23-749 |
Edith Littlefield Sundby, as Trustee v. Jeffrey Myers, et al. |
California |
Denied |
|
amendment-iii civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process judicial-interpretation legal-rationing standing supreme-court-review takings |
Whether, "as the final arbiter of the law", this Court will "guard " the Constitution by enforcing the Amendment III due process guarantee, or permit … |
5.5 |
| 23-754 |
Van Sant & Co. v. Town of Calhan, Colorado, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
|
antitrust-immunity circuit-split civil-rights due-process government-petitioning-activity local-government local-government-antitrust-act noerr-pennington noerr-pennington-doctrine summary-judgment |
1. Does the LGAA entitle local government officials to immunity from antitrust damages when they act unlawfully?
2. Does a Court of Appeals impermiss… |
5.5 |
| 23A718 |
Coronavirus Reporter, et al. v. Apple, Inc. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
|
antitrust market-definition monopoly sherman-act software-distribution tying-arrangement |
Given the Ninth Circuit's overt failure to address the pernicious tying of digital software distribution stores to the iPhone device by Apple Inc., do… |
5.5 |
| 23M65 |
Dustin Nguyen v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 23M66 |
Saloojas, Inc. v. Aetna Health of California, Inc. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 23-527 |
Raji Rab v. Shirley N. Weber, California Secretary of State, et al. |
California |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
constitutional-rights due-process election-code election-integrity election-law judicial-review legislative-intent statutory-construction statutory-interpretation vote-counting |
1. Whether the lower courts failed to address the important question of law to prevent the violation of constitutional rights and the greatest miscarr… |
4.0 |
| 23-528 |
Michael S. Barth v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
appeal appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process intervention-rights judicial-access media-representation procedural-due-process recusal standing |
I. Whether Petitioner is entitled to intervene as
of right and permissively in this litigation; and
denial of the general public's right of access to
… |
4.0 |
| 23-559 |
Adekunle C. Omoyosi v. Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
appeal-timeliness civil-procedure court-discretion due-process eeoc federal-courts judicial-exception legal-procedure procedural-rules standing timeliness |
Whether, or under what circumstances, may the court excuse untimeliness of appeal. |
4.0 |
| 23-596 |
Yoseph Yadessa Kenno v. Colorado Governor's Office of Information Technology, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
circuit-split civil-procedure due-process judicial-discretion newly-discovered-evidence pro-se pro-se-litigation rule-59 rule-59-motion spoliation-of-evidence |
1. Whether the Lower Courts violated Supreme Court precedents governing pro se pleading by construing my pro se Rule 59(a) motion expressly seeking a … |
4.0 |
| 23-616 |
Estate of William Han Manstrom-Greening, Through Carol J. Manstrom, Personal Representative v. Lane County, Oregon, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
2nd-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process evidence-relevance expert-testimony free-speech gun-violence negligence psychological-impact standing suicide |
The Federal Rules of Evidence establish the framework within courts must make their determina tions as to admissibility. Under Rule 402, the baseline … |
3.5 |
| 23-620 |
Dominique Gerald Burns v. South Carolina Department of Social Services |
South Carolina |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-agency administrative-law agency-authority civil-procedure constitutional-provisions due-process judicial-authority jurisdiction jurisdiction-challenge procedural-due-process standing state-agency |
1. WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS
ERRED IN ITS RULING WHEN IT FAILED TO
PROTECT THE APPELLANT 'S PROCEDULE
DUE PROCESS.
2. WHETHER STATE ADMINISTRAT… |
3.5 |
| 23-732 |
Richard Plishka v. William Skurla, et al. |
Ohio |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-courts civil-procedure constitutional-law ecclesiastical-abstention first-amendment religious-freedom standing subject-matter-jurisdiction |
Whether the First Amendment doctrine of ecclesiastical abstention operates to deprive civil courts of subject-matter jurisdiction. |
3.5 |
| 23-733 |
Jada Ku v. Great Falls College Montana State University |
Montana |
Denied |
Response Waived |
accommodation civil-rights disability-discrimination due-process educational-discrimination equal-protection mental-health-rights reasonable-accommodation standing state-university |
Can the Great Falls College Montana State University discriminate against
me because of my mental disability?
Will the Supreme Court of the State of… |
3.5 |
| 23-750 |
Jennica Carmona, Individually, and as Parent and Natural Guardian of B. A., et al. v. New Jersey Department of Education, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-exhaustion change-in-placement disability-rights due-process educational-placement equal-protection idea individuals-with-disabilities-education-act rehabilitation-act standing virtual-instruction |
1. Whether the move from in-person to virtual
educational instruction and support services
constitutes a change in placement under the
Individuals … |
3.5 |
| 23-758 |
Brian Chancey v. BASF Corporation |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
ada americans-with-disabilities-act business-necessity covid-policy direct-threat disability-discrimination employment-discrimination qualification-standards retaliation |
Did the Court abuse its discretion in dismissing the amended complaint for disability discrimination and retaliation?
Does an employer violate the AD… |
3.5 |
| 23-770 |
John Doe v. Bill Crouch, in His Official Capacity as Cabinet Secretary of the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
constitutional-challenge equal-protection federal-jurisdiction jurisdiction redressability rooker-feldman standing state-court |
Does Rooker-Feldman bar jurisdiction when declaring a statute unconstitutional would undermine a state court's reliance upon the statute?
Does Rooker… |
3.5 |
| 23-771 |
Jill L. Stein, et al. v. Federal Election Commission |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Response Waived |
ballot-access federal-election-commission minor-party presidential-primary public-financing ballot-access equal-protection minor-party-candidates presidential-election primary-campaign public-financing |
Whether 26 U.S.C. § 9032(6) violates the equal protection of law by guaranteeing that major party candidates are eligible to receive public financing … |
3.5 |
| 23-772 |
David Andrew Bardes v. George W. Bush, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitution constitutional-challenge due-process federal-dismissal judicial-procedure pro-se standing supreme-court |
Why does the Constitution, or laws of any kind, not apply to George Walker BUSH or his associates? Why has the Constitution failed? Why does the Supre… |
3.5 |
| 23-774 |
Melissa Groo v. Amy Eddy, Judge, Montana Eleventh Judicial District Court |
Montana |
Denied |
Response Waived |
due-process forum-state intentional-tort non-resident-defendant personal-jurisdiction purposeful-direction social-media walden-v-fiore |
Whether the Due Process Clause permits a state court to exercise specific personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant in an intentional tort c… |
3.5 |
| 23-782 |
Kent Thomas Warren v. Department of Education |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-law civil-rights department-of-education discrimination due-process federal-financial-assistance legal-mandate loan-default non-discrimination student-loans |
December 2016, the day before Christmas Eve, the petitioner received a correspondence from U.S. Department of Education stating payment on his student… |
3.5 |
| 23-783 |
Darren Kossen v. Asia Pacific Airlines, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-hearing air-21-statute burden-of-proof burdens-of-proof circumstantial-evidence clear-and-convincing-evidence legal-standard prima-facie res-judicata whistleblower-protection |
1. Did the ALJ, ARB and the 9th Circuit turn on its head AIR 21 law on burdens of proof by requiring a whistleblower to prove causation by a "preponde… |
3.5 |
| 23-787 |
Sierra Nevada Transportation, Inc. v. Nevada Transportation Authority |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-U.S.C.-1983 42-U.S.C.-1985 dormant-Commerce-Clause federal-licensing federal-preemption interstate-commerce public-necessity state-regulation transportation-services |
Does a federally-licensed limousine company state a valid claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 against state regulators for violating the… |
3.5 |
| 23-791 |
Peter Thompson v. Gregg Sullivan, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appeal appellate-procedure civil-procedure district-court-proceedings due-process fraud ninth-circuit-rules pro-se-filing procedural-due-process record record-exclusion standing |
1. Did the Ninth Circuit err in concluding that the lower US District Court of Montana proceedings could be equitably affirmed when the district court… |
3.5 |
| 23-792 |
Jehan Agrama v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-search due-process international-comity investigative-procedure irs-summons powell-vs-united-states treaty-disclosure united-states-vs-clarke |
1. Whether the district court erred under United
States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48 (1964), and United States
v. Clarke, 573 U.S. 248 (2014), in enforcing … |
3.5 |
| 23-801 |
Richard George, et al. v. Triton Property Investments, LLC |
California |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights contract-clause due-process equal-protection judicial-bias pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigants seventh-amendment state-courts |
Whether the empirical evidence of bias against, otherwise identically situated, pro se litigants in state courts proves the judicial intent to discrim… |
3.5 |
| 23-809 |
Peter Kleidman v. Martin R. Barash, Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
brown-vs-board civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-tort due-process equitable-relief federal-judges free-speech judicial-immunity prospective-injunction pulliam-precedent standing |
Are federal judges immune from claims for equitable relief? Pulliam v. Allen, 466 US 522 (1984) held "that judicial immunity is not a bar to prospecti… |
3.5 |
| 23-811 |
Barry Ahuruonye v. Department of the Interior |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-law article-iii civil-procedure collateral-estoppel due-process issue-preclusion merit-systems-protection-board mootness standing wage-increase |
(1) Whether the principles of collateral estoppel/Issue preclusion applies when Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) a quasi-judicial federal adminis… |
3.5 |
| 23-827 |
Clifton Capital Group, LLC v. Bradley Sharp |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
article-iii article-three-standing bankruptcy bankruptcy-appeal bankruptcy-standing chapter-11 chapter-eleven creditor creditor-rights injury-in-fact standing trustee |
If a bankruptcy plan proposes to pay creditors in full with interest, does a creditor who alleges that a bankruptcy court order will delay its receipt… |
3.5 |
| 23-835 |
Association of Club Executives of Dallas, Inc., et al. v. City of Dallas, Texas |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
content-based content-neutral content-neutrality evidentiary-burden first-amendment intermediate-scrutiny secondary-effects sexually-oriented-businesses strict-scrutiny |
1. The secondary effects doctrine of City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., 475 U.S. 41 (1986), provides that regulations adopted for the content-… |
3.5 |
| 23-838 |
Brian D. Swanson v. Brad Raffensperger, Georgia Secretary of State |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
17th-amendment ballot-legality civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process election-law elections equal-suffrage seventeenth-amendment standing statutory-violation |
The Seventeenth Amendment deprives the States of their equal suffrage in the Senate, requiring their consent under Article V of the Constitution, beca… |
3.5 |
| 23-845 |
Timothy Ray Vasquez v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
bribery criminal-procedure due-process honest-services-fraud official-act public-official quid-pro-quo quid-pro-quo-bribery statutory-interpretation |
Does quid pro quo bribery, in the context of an honest services fraud prosecution, permit conviction on the basis that a public official received a be… |
3.5 |
| 23-864 |
Robert Holton v. Robert Henon, aka Bobby Henon, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process eminent-domain standing takings |
1. In 1951 the City of Philadelphia was granted Home Rule by the Pennsylvania General Assembly. In 1951, Philadelphia used its eminent domain power to… |
3.5 |
| 23-865 |
Dale Wendall Laue v. State Bar of California |
California |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights diversity-equity-inclusion due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment liberty-interest licensing moral-character standing state-bar-admission |
1. Whether admission to a State Bar, or other
state licensing agency, constitutes a liberty interest
under the United States Constitution.
2. Wheth… |
3.5 |
| 23-884 |
Marco Antonio Perez v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
circuit-split criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process grand-jury harmless-error judicial-interpretation release-violation sentencing-enhancement statutory-maximum |
1. Does an enhanced sentence pursuant to 18 USC § 3147 authorize a punishment exceeding the statutory maximum sentence for the underlying offense comm… |
3.5 |
| 23-888 |
Alfredo Felipe Rasco v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure deportation-consequences guilty-plea guilty-plea-withdrawal ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel padilla-precedent padilla-v-kentucky rule-11 rule-11-violation |
Whether the Eleventh Circuit's decision to deny my C.O.A. and the district court's denial of my motion to withdraw my guilty plea contravenes this Cou… |
3.5 |
| 23-895 |
Richard Rogalinski v. Meta Platforms, Inc. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
censorship civil-procedure civil-rights due-process first-amendment free-speech protected-speech social-media standing state-action |
The Executive Branch of the United States Government acted in concert with Meta Platforms, Inc., to censor protected speech.
The questions presented … |
3.5 |
| 20-6272 |
Domonic Devarrise Usher v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Rehearing |
Relisted (2)IFP |
18-usc-924(c)(3)(a) circuit-split crime-of-violence criminal-law force-clause hobbs-act johnson-v-united-states sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation |
Whether Hobbs Act robbery, which can be committed by putting another in fear of future injury to himself, his property, or even his intangible propert… |
1.0 |
| 23-5793 |
Phillip Serapio Baca v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
4th-amendment brendlin-precedent circuit-split civil-rights exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment passenger-rights search-and-seizure standing traffic-stop vehicle-detention |
Whether a passenger in a vehicle subject to a traffic stop may contest the legality of his detention, as this Court held in Brendlin v. California, or… |
0.5 |
| 23-6497 |
Alex Marquez v. Tim Garrett, Warden, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-rights criminal-procedure fifth-amendment habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-counsel involuntary-confession miranda-warning ninth-circuit |
1. Did the Ninth Circuit err when Alex Marquez made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right as to an inadequate Miranda warning … |
0.5 |
| 23-5633 |
Demetrius Verardi Ramos v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure de-novo-review due-process factual-error judicial-procedure magistrate-judge objection-standard report-and-recommendation waiver |
In United States v. Raddatz , 447 U.S. 667 (1980), this Court made clear that the designation of authority to a magistrate judge to conduct evidentiar… |
-1.0 |
| 23-6630 |
Terry L. Terry v. Tim Hooper, Warden |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process jackson-v-virginia molestation sexual-assault statutory-interpretation sufficiency-of-evidence victim-testimony |
Did the state court unreasonably apply Jackson v. Virginia when it determined that evidence presented at trial was sufficient to sustain Terry's convi… |
-1.5 |
| 23-6645 |
Arthur Johnson v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-law criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process fifth-amendment sentencing sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation supervised-release |
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g) comports with the Fifth and Sixth Amendments? |
-1.5 |
| 23-6709 |
Martin Akerman v. United States |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
actual-innocence detention-challenge due-process escape-hatch-provision federal-detention habeas-corpus posse-comitatus standing statutory-interpretation |
1. Does the Chief Data Officer of the National Guard, appointed under 44 U.S.C. § 3520, with standing under 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(1) and (c)(2), and det… |
-1.5 |
| 23-6711 |
Ronnie Collins, Jr. v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
confrontation-clause constitutional-rights criminal-procedure cross-examination due-process evidence harmful-error harmless-error witness-testimony |
Whether the limits placed on Collins's right to cross-examine the central witness against him constituted harmful error. |
-1.5 |
| 23-6739 |
John Richard Brinson v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
8th-amendment child-pornography criminal-history criminal-sentencing due-process life-without-parole rehabilitation sentencing-reasonableness substantive-due-process substantive-reasonableness |
Whether a life without parole sentence for a 24 year old with no prior criminal record for producing child pornography is substantively unreasonable? |
-1.5 |
| 23-6742 |
Alexander D. Pennington v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
5th-amendment 5th-amendment-rights 5th-circuit criminal-investigation criminal-procedure custody fifth-amendment interrogation miranda-rights search-warrant |
Under the Fifth Amendment, is a suspect in a criminal investigation "in custody" when he is ordered out of his residence by armed agents who broke dow… |
-1.5 |
| 23-6749 |
Craig Alan Morrison v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-split criminal-sentencing judicial-interpretation physical-restraint plain-text recurring-issue sentencing-commission sentencing-guidelines victim-definition |
Whether a defendant should receive an increased sentence under U.S.S.G. § 3A1.3 for having "physically restrained" a victim, where the conduct at issu… |
-1.5 |
| 23-6751 |
Delon Joseph Adams v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-924 concurrent-sentence concurrent-sentences criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-criminal-procedure federal-statute firearm-offense sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation |
Whether 18 U.S.C. Section 924(c)(1)(D)(ii) precludes a sentencing court from imposing a sentence for a Section 924(c) firearm offense partially concur… |
-1.5 |
| 23-6759 |
Hia-Keem Don'ae Rice v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure due-process federal-rules-criminal-procedure federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure judicial-discretion sentencing supervised-release written-judgment |
Whether Rule 43(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which requires a defendant to be present at sentencing, permits the sentencing judge… |
-1.5 |
| 23-6769 |
Derrick Durrell Jones v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2nd-amendment commerce-clause constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure due-process federal-firearms-law federal-jurisdiction firearm-possession interstate-commerce second-amendment standing statutory-interpretation |
1. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) permits conviction for the possession of any firearm
that has ever crossed state lines at any time in the indefinite pas… |
-1.5 |
| 23-6799 |
Leon King v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process federal-sentencing judicial-discretion legal-reasoning sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation |
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c) requires a sentencing court which rejects a defendant's nonfrivilous arguments in favor of a lower sentence to explain its… |
-1.5 |
| 23-6803 |
Eduardo Garcia Briseno v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
almendarez-torres constitutional-interpretation criminal-law historical-record notice notice-clause prior-conviction-exception sixth-amendment sixth-amendment-text supreme-court-precedent |
Whether, in light of the historical record, Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523
U.S. 224 (1998), should be overruled? |
-1.5 |
| 23-6808 |
Joseph Michael King, aka Joey King v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
burden-of-proof circuit-split criminal-procedure due-process non-indigent sentencing sentencing-enhancement special-assessment statutory-interpretation |
Under 18 U.S.C. § 3014(a), defendants convicted of certain sexual offenses must be assessed a $5000 special assessment if one other condition is met —… |
-1.5 |
| 23-5481 |
Festus Okwudili Ohan v. Armando B. Fontoura, Sheriff, Essex County, New Jersey, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights digital-privacy due-process excessive-force false-arrest fourth-amendment law-enforcement malicious-prosecution probable-cause retaliation traffic-stop warrantless-search |
Question not identified. |
-4.0 |
| 23-5804 |
Joseph Alexander Clarke v. Kimberly M. Esmond Adams, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process federal-jurisdiction interstate-commerce jurisdictional-limits legal-procedure maxims-of-law pleadings standing supreme-court-review |
Did the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals Fail to Effectually Duties When on the File of the Record and Fail to Administer Justly the Mass of the Case… |
-4.0 |
| 23-5864 |
Alfred Starling v. Charles Mims, Warden |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
actual-innocence aedpa aedpa-statute constitutional-violations equitable-tolling gateway-claim habeas-corpus statute-of-limitations |
1. Whether the lower courts erred in holding that reasonable jurists would not debate whether Petitioner's First Federal Habeas Corpus petition was un… |
-4.0 |
| 23-6071 |
Christopher L. Takhvar v. Warner Bros. Discovery Inc., et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
42-usc-1983 civil-rights conspiracy constitutional-claim due-process habeas-corpus post-conviction-relief standing state-court-procedure |
Question not identified. |
-4.0 |
| 23-6360 |
In Re Burt Setts |
|
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
5th-amendment capital-conviction civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process grand-jury indictment |
Whether Petitioner was denied the right to a capital conviction without a Grand Jury's indictment, under the U.S.C., 5th Amendment, violating due proc… |
-4.0 |
| 23-5105 |
Russell Garvis Griffith, Jr. v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
child-abuse circuit-split evidence-rule-803(4) hearsay hearsay-exception household-abuse medical-diagnosis medical-treatment rule-803(4) witness-testimony |
Whether a party seeking to admit an out-of-court statement pursuant to Rule 803(4) must show that the speaker subjectively knew that the identity of t… |
-4.5 |
| 23-6157 |
Mario Alberto Netro-Perales v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law circuit-split deference federal-courts federal-sentencing-guidelines judicial-deference kisor-v-wilkie sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation stinson-v-united-states |
1. The circuits have split over the extent of deference that is to be given to the commentaries to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines after the decisio… |
-4.5 |
| 23-6436 |
Luis Manso v. Patricia McGill, Administrator, Northern State Prison, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
brady-violation court-of-appeals evidence-suppression ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-instructions lesser-included-offenses prosecutorial-misconduct strickland-standard strickland-v-washington strong-evidence |
1. Does Strickland v. Washington allow the Court of Appeals to dismiss the defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim based on "strong eviden… |
-4.5 |
| 23-6443 |
Pablo Enrique Rosado-Sanchez v. Pablo Crespo-Claudio, et al. |
First Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
attorney-assignment civil-rights constitutional-rights contract due-process fraud loan-modification loan-promissory-note pro-se-rights promissory-note secured-loan |
1. On the 2nd Hearing with Judge Gina Mendez Miro, the U.S. District Court defended
the Pro Bono Program to force me to accept a free of costs attorn… |
-4.5 |
| 23-6449 |
Robert James Swint v. Dish Network, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure constitutional-law fifth-amendment jurisdiction standing takings-clause |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 23-6456 |
Tyree Earl Ford v. Carmine Marceno, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-litigation civil-procedure constitutional-rights court-orders due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure judicial-review legal-procedure standing summary-judgment |
ZdusS (l) ujA/ Mi hsZZtcZ c'oo/S Jizz^&d ?A&</
/«3 r/<? k<Ztr*J /sZt* o£ &»t/ prscid*/* /* CA)0-3)^J a -SW^*/y
dZ&fw/Z JvJjisntjtf fiQf fig a ~.£6/ mp… |
-4.5 |
| 23-6462 |
Arthur Harris v. New Rez, LLC, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process jurisdiction legal-procedure patent separation-of-powers standing supreme-court takings writ-of-certiorari |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 23-6465 |
Lewis Slaughter v. New York |
New York |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review certiorari civil-procedure due-process judicial-process legal-petition notice opportunity-to-be-heard property-seizure supreme-court takings |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 23-6471 |
Edward J. Steiner v. Brent Kempster, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech standing video-evidence |
(j3/'/W^xrs 0-4
(^p) T7\e £ f 1 on<, 5-fr<c^^ »A/
ft>fh£. ca <S^,/
A 7 v/ickso^ C Ic'^' 1 1 d-Ac, i£ fo f^
(^jy h/ »71 f Ki S case A of ^eTs f\l^ t ^ … |
-4.5 |
| 23-6472 |
Keith L. Allen v. Nebraska |
Nebraska |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-bar credible-threats impartial-jury juror-misconduct juror-threats no-impeachment-rule sixth-amendment sixth-amendment-violation verdict-influence |
Whether a no-impeachment rule constitutionally bars evidence of credible threats of violence against the jurors influencing their verdict offered to p… |
-4.5 |
| 23-6482 |
Christopher J. Barnett v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review brady-rule constitutional-provisions conviction-integrity criminal-procedure due-process judicial-process legal-jurisdiction petition-review prosecutorial-misconduct supreme-court-procedure writ-of-certiorari |
MAY A COURT ENFORCE BRADY AND NAPUE VIOLATIONS THAT JEOPARDIZE A DEFENDANT'S RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL AND DOES THE BRADY/NAPUE ISSUES ARISE WHEN A CHANGE… |
-4.5 |
| 21-7103 |
Roger D. Ream v. Florida |
Florida |
Rehearing |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights due-process first-amendment internet-access liberty-interest liberty-rights packingham-v-north-carolina probation-conditions property-rights supervised-release |
Under the First Amendment, does a person on probation or other form of
supervised release have a constitutional right to access the Internet or other… |
-6.0 |
| 23-5582 |
Juan Manuel Reyes v. Washington County, Oregon, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
4th-amendment accrual-of-discovery civil-rights constitutional-rights constructive-notice due-process fourth-amendment governmental-action section-1983 statute-of-limitations |
A.) Does a Fourth Amendment or any other United States Constitutional Amendment violation have a federal expiration date or time limitation other than… |
-6.0 |
| 23-5984 |
Lawrence F. Curtin v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights due-process eighth-amendment excessive-fines fourteenth-amendment incorporation |
Question not identified. |
-6.0 |
| 23-6125 |
Walter Lancaster v. Beats Electronics LLC, et al. |
California |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
14th-amendment civil-rights due-process fraud-on-court fraud-on-the-court miscarriage-of-justice petition-for-review stare-decisis |
With herein evidenced incompetence that cannot be ascribed to any agency view or expertise coupled with Fraud on the Court in collusion spanning from … |
-6.0 |
| 23-6137 |
In Re Ronald Boyajian |
|
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appeal-of-right constitutional-rights criminal-appeal criminal-procedure due-process judicial-assignment judicial-recusal prejudice recusal three-judge-panel |
1. In an only appeal of right of a criminal judgment, did Respondents deny defendant-appellant Ronald Boyajian's ("Petitioner") Due Process in failing… |
-6.0 |
| 23-6311 |
David Clum, Jr. v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appellate-review circuit-court civil-procedure due-process judicial-review manifest-injustice miscarriage-of-justice supervisory-powers writ-of-certiorari |
SHOULD THIS COURT GRANT THE WRIT WHERE IT IS SHOWN FROM THE RECORD THAT THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS HAS SO FAR DEPARTED FROM THE ACCEPTED AN… |
-6.0 |
| 23-6399 |
Michael Salinas v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
conspiracy controlled-substance controlled-substances criminal-intent criminal-law drug-conspiracy mandatory-minimum mens-rea sentencing sentencing-enhancement |
Whether, to prove conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance triggering mandatory-minimum and increased-maximum penalties, the government must pr… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6444 |
David D. Madriz, Jr. v. Adam Aron, et al. |
Delaware |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
chancery-court civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process extraordinary-circumstances interlocutory-appeal standing stockholder-litigation supreme-court-procedure |
Whether the Supreme Court of Delaware failed to follow Delaware Chancery Court's procedures of and whether this court was required to consider scope o… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6455 |
Darrel R. Fisher v. United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
42-usc-1981 42-usc-1982 4th-amendment civil-rights conspiracy constitutional-protections due-process fourth-amendment law-enforcement property-rights trespass warrantless-search |
1) first: 4:99-01.2-BCW; When wasLibfie Federal Government allowed to "open" a [case]
against me in 1999, and when was any indictment fitst made publi… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6467 |
Fairly W. Earls v. Salam Syed, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure constitutional-law genuine-issues-of-dispute jury-function rule-of-orderliness summary-judgment supremacy-clause |
ISSUE 1. Whether the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals committed error's
of Constitution Law by failing to follow the Supremacy Clause
of the Federal… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6483 |
Joanne J. Antrobus v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech precedent standing |
Question not identified. |
-6.5 |
| 23-6509 |
Jonathan Joseph Good v. Wendi Walworth, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law agency-charging-document civil-rights due-process judicial-procedure magistrate notice notice-requirement rule-83 summary-judgment |
Question No. 1
Should this Court grant Certiorari where Petitioner Good was denied notice
when, despite an order of Stay for further discovery and an … |
-6.5 |
| 23-6535 |
Ryan C. Armstrong v. United States Federal Government, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
capital-case civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-government judicial-circuit law-enforcement mental-health standing state-government state-jurisdiction |
I am not presenting my case to the Supreme Court with a question. My case is being presented to the Supreme Court as a matter of right. My case is a c… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6540 |
Jennifer Agnes Lopez v. California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection fair-trial fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment government-immunity state-actors statute-of-limitations |
1. Whether the State actors can deprive the individual of a fair treatment which violates the guarantees of the Fifth Fourteenth Amendment;
2. Whethe… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6563 |
Justin Taylor v. Tim Hooper, Warden |
Louisiana |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment civil-procedure due-process jurisdiction legal-standing procedural-challenge remand standing state-court supreme-court void-proceedings |
I
Whether this Honorable United States Supreme Court 'must " investigate and resolve
jurisdiction if raised by one of the petitioning party(ies) to … |
-6.5 |
| 23-6569 |
Leonard Nyamusevya v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
bankruptcy bankruptcy-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process in-rem-action judicial-report property-rights rule-9011 takings |
Isn't a per se taking when Rule 9011 and Constitutions were violated, when an invalid Supplemental Final Judicial Report was left for the U.S. Supreme… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6581 |
Eric Adam Grueninger v. Chadwick Dotson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
assets-liabilities child-support disability employment-history financial-disclosure income-sources prisoner-filing retirement spouse-employment support-expenses unemployment |
Can the states highest court deny habeas corpus claims based solely on procedural default that occurred in the direct criminal appeals process when th… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6586 |
Devrick Raquan Gail v. Virginia |
Virginia |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-law due-process federal-courts jurisdiction standing |
Question not identified. |
-6.5 |
| 23-6593 |
Larry Rush, aka Leroy Thomas v. Michael Zaken, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Greene, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeals appellate-procedure constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus judicial-review jurisdiction petition-denial third-circuit |
1. Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit err in affirming Mr. Rush's Denial of Habeas Corpus? |
-6.5 |
| 23-6596 |
Kenneth Roshaun Reid v. United States District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
board-of-immigration-appeals child-status-protection-act criminal-procedure discretion discretionary-review fair-sentencing-act immigration-law plain-error priority-date retroactivity sentencing statutory-interpretation |
Question not identified. |
-6.5 |
| 23-6604 |
Nicole Johnson v. Massachusetts Department of Children and Families |
Massachusetts |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
7th-amendment best-interests child-custody due-process jury-trial massachusetts-rule-38 parental-rights sua-sponte termination termination-of-parental-rights |
1. Whether the petitioners right to due process and 7th amendment right and Massachusetts ruie 38 Jury Trial of Right was violated when petitioner fil… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6611 |
Morice Ervin v. Indiana |
Indiana |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment constitutional-rights due-process expert-testimony expert-witness-testimony fair-trial favorable-evidence fourteenth-amendment lack-of-evidence post-autopsy prejudicial-questioning |
Whether petitioner's Due process - 14th Amendment of the Federal Constitution was violated by allowing post autopsy?
Whether petitioner's Due process… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6618 |
Mabior M. Mabior v. Nebraska |
Nebraska |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review confrontation-clause cross-examination hearsay hearsay-exception ineffective-assistance sixth-amendment testimonial-statement testimonial-statements |
1) Is a defendant's right to confrontation under the Sixth
Amendment violated when testimonial statements are
admitted for the truth of the matters as… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6620 |
Bruce A. Quarles v. Joseph Terra, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Phoenix, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure constitutional-rights diligence-requirement due-process ex-post-facto federal-rules-of-civil-procedure rule-60 rule-60(d)(1) timely-filing |
IS AN IMPOSITION OF A DILIGENCE REQUIREMENT UPON A TIMELY FILED FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(d)(1) MOTION A VIOLATION OF THE RULE?
DOES AN EX … |
-6.5 |
| 23-6632 |
Jasen Randhawa v. Wisconsin |
Wisconsin |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional constitutional-rights criminal-procedure deterrence due-process general-deterrence sentencing sentencing-discretion social-science social-science-evidence |
I. Does a court violate a defendant's right to due process when a lengthy sentence is based upon mistaken information that a severe sentence will dete… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6640 |
Garland Ray Gregory, Jr. v. South Dakota |
South Dakota |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
amendment-claim collateral-estoppel constitutional-violation coram-nobis cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-discretion procedural-error res-judicata |
Did South Dakota Supreme Court abuse its discretion, affirming South Dakota Fourth
Judicial Circuit Court 's dismissal of Petitioner 's Petition For W… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6694 |
Michael T. Braxton v. Warden, Anderson County Detention Center |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process probable-cause state-corrective-process state-court-abuse subject-matter-jurisdiction younger-abstention |
Did the State of South Carolina deny the Petitioner a Substantial Constitutional right to a "Constitutionally Adequate " [ PROBABLE CAUSE] determinati… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6695 |
Douglas W. Curtis v. Brian Eller, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
aedpa appellate-review due-process fourteenth-amendment novel-state-procedural-default plea-offer procedural-default standard-of-review state-procedural-default |
1) Whether Petitioner was denied his Fourteenth Amendment right to
the Due Process of Law when the Sixth Circuit Appellate Court denied
relief without… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6696 |
Anthony Daniels v. Mark Miller, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
due-process due-process-violation ineffective-assistance right-to-counsel sixth-amendment suggestive-identification |
Whether the District Court errored for denial of Petitioner's claim that the State Identification was suggestive, improper and the State Court conclus… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6722 |
Jeffrey Holland v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
crack-cocaine criminal-sentencing due-process fair-trial first-step-act jury-trial sentence-enhancement sentencing-discretion sentencing-enhancements trial-transcript |
In Concepcion v. United States , 597 U.S. 481, 142 S. Ct. 2389, 2404 213 L. Ed. 2d 731 (2022), this Court held that the First Step Act "allows distric… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6725 |
Deonte Marques Curry v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
court-of-appeals criminal-procedure due-process electronic-filing forfeiture notice restitution sentencing sentencing-error |
1. In Dolan v. United States, 560 U.S. 605 (2010), the Court held that compliance with the statutory deadline for determining restitution was unnecess… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6730 |
Bryant Calloway v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-jurisdiction criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial grand-jury ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review material-evidence prosecutorial-misconduct witness-credibility witness-testimony |
Whether despite evidence that the fundamental witness of the prosecution, in the shape of violation passed on the divergeceptions of Thomas Valdez Gui… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6735 |
Fuhai Li v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
actual-innocence certificate-of-appealability change-in-law conflict-of-interest fraudulent-conduct ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mandate-recall new-evidence |
1. Should the Court of appeals recall its mandate denying Petitioner's application for a certificate of appealability (COA) when Petitioner has demons… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6740 |
George Willie Rios v. Arizona |
Arizona |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
5th-amendment civil-rights counsel-presence criminal-procedure custodial-interrogation due-process fifth-amendment miranda-v-arizona miranda-warning right-to-counsel |
When police sought a custodial interrogation with George Rios, prior to questioning, an officer read the following warning:
You have the right to rem… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6741 |
Gerardo Ortiz v. Jeff Macomber, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
confrontation-clause due-process fair-trial fundamental-fairness habeas-corpus prosecutorial-misconduct right-to-confront witness-testimony |
The prosecutor wrongly informed the complaining witness, Monica Doe, that she had a right to refuse to testify. At trial, she exercised that purported… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6743 |
Loren J. Larson, Jr. v. Alaska |
Alaska |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-claims effective-assistance effective-representation exhaustion-requirement exhaustion-requirements habeas-corpus procedural-default sixth-amendment |
Does the Sixth Amendment right to "effective representation" require that an attorney provide meaningful, conflict free consultation prior to the atto… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6748 |
Eric Lavell Minter v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
burden-of-proof circuit-court-review civil-rights clear-error-standard criminal-enterprise criminal-procedure due-process evidence fact-based-enhancement managerial-role sentencing sentencing-enhancement |
Must a district court find that a defendant exercised control over another participant in a criminal enterprise before considering a managerial role s… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6750 |
Patrick Aboite v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2nd-amendment civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process federal-statute felony-conviction firearm-possession second-amendment standing statutory-interpretation |
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), the federal statute that prohibits a person from possessing a firearm if he has been convicted of "a crime punishable b… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6754 |
Rodwick F. Abadam v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2nd-amendment appellate-review appellate-waiver constitutional-violation miscarriage-of-justice plea-agreement second-amendment sentencing sentencing-error |
1. Did the Ninth Circuit err when it failed to find that sentencing errors that violated Mr. Abadam's Second Amendment rights can amount to a "miscarr… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6756 |
Kenneth J. Coleman v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
competency-hearing confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mental-competency pate-v-robinson plea-agreement |
1). Is the petitioner constitutionally entitled to a hearing upon the issue of his competency to stand trial.
Was the petitioner tried, convicted and… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6763 |
Armani L. Moore v. Illinois |
Illinois |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
confrontation-clause crawford-v-washington criminal-procedure evidence evidence-law memory-loss sixth-amendment testimonial-hearsay unavailable-witness witness-unavailability |
Whether a declarant is "unavailable to testify" for purposes of the Sixth Amendment, and as that phrase is used in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6767 |
Michael Samuel Hudson, Jr. v. Melissa Andrewjeski, Superintendent, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
bill-of-rights citizenship due-process fourteenth-amendment grand-jury grand-jury-clause hurtado-v-california incorporation-doctrine privileges-and-immunities privileges-immunities |
1. Does the fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause, by means through the Hm% §liuii (which imlyiii the duil=©itiiiniMp elsuii, thi pfivilggii … |
-6.5 |
| 23-6768 |
Vidal Garza-Morin v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
burden-of-proof criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process indictment jury-trial prior-convictions sentencing statutory-maximum |
Whether all facts—including the fact of a prior conviction—that increase a defendant's statutory maximum must be pleaded in the indictment and either … |
-6.5 |
| 23-6770 |
Juan Carlos Burns v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-1 18-usc-924 crime-of-violence criminal-law federal-criminal-law federal-sentencing second-degree-murder sentencing-enhancement statutory-definition statutory-interpretation violent-crime |
Does second-degree murder in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1 categorically qualify as a "crime of violence" within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(8)(A)? |
-6.5 |
| 23-6774 |
Tremayne Silas v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
ambiguity appeal-waiver circuit-court criminal-appeal guilty-plea involuntary involuntary-plea legal-ambiguity summary-reversal |
Whether this Court should summarily reverse the Eighth Circuit's dismissal of Silas's appeal when the appeal waiver is ambiguous as to whether it appl… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6777 |
Monty Dwayne Sullivan v. Wyoming |
Wyoming |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
brady-v-maryland brady-violation constitutional-rights court-transcripts discovery discovery-rules due-process exculpatory-evidence medical-records retroactive-application |
1. Does Mr. Sullivan have a Constitutional Right to Court Transcripts and Medical Records dispositive to the State's theory of the case?
2. May this … |
-6.5 |
| 23-6783 |
Kevin F. Jackson v. Applied Materials Corporation, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
court-reporter due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment jameson-vs-desta mandatory-arbitration pro-se-plaintiff |
In Jackson vs Applied Materials, Wherein the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has decided an important question of Federal Law that has not been, but shou… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6790 |
James Hamilton v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-split drug-sentencing ineffective-assistance mens-rea sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation |
Counsel ineffective in violation of the Sixth Amendment for failing to recognize and address the methamphetamine disparity violation committed by the … |
-6.5 |
| 23-6793 |
Timothy Burks v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2nd-amendment constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-statute due-process federal-jurisdiction firearm-possession interstate-commerce second-amendment |
1. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) violates the Second Amendment under New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, 142 S. Ct. 2111 (2022).… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6794 |
Isaac Cardona v. United States |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-intent double-jeopardy due-process merger-problem money-laundering specified-unlawful-activity statutory-interpretation vagueness vagueness-doctrine |
I. Whether the promotional money laundering provision of Money Laundering Control Act of 1986, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1956 (a)(1)(A)(i), violates the due proce… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6796 |
Yanier N. Tellez, aka Yanier Tellez-Crespo v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
4th-amendment consent consent-search fourth-amendment probable-cause search-and-seizure seizure-of-evidence traffic-stop wallet-search warrantless-search |
Was the District Court's denial of Petitioner's Motion to Suppress a
result of clear error in determining the facts relative to consent for
search v… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6798 |
Qaya Mikel Gordon v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
congressional-power constitutional-authority due-process indian-affairs major-crimes-act native-nations tribal-sovereignty trust-obligations |
1. Whether Congress exceeded its authority under the Constitution by enacting the Major Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. §1153, as applied to crimes committed by… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6802 |
Wally Irizarry-Sisco v. United States |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
child-sex-abuse child-sex-case criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process evidence-law excited-utterance hearsay hearsay-exception sixth-amendment |
1. Whether Federal Rule of Evidence 803(2), the hearsay exception for "excited utterances," encompasses out of court statements that (a) go beyond the… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6809 |
Warren Lee Mackey v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review circuit-split criminal-procedure due-process evidence harmless-error judicial-precedent prejudice prejudice-standard trial-testimony witness-bolstering witness-testimony |
Circuits are applying different tests to gauge prejudice resulting from testimony that improperly bolsters or vouches for the testimony of another wit… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6817 |
Israel Santiago-Lugo v. United States |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure due-process federal-courts federal-rules-criminal-procedure first-circuit judicial-quorum nguyen-v-us notice-of-appeal standing supreme-court supreme-court-precedent |
1) Whether the First Circuit's Judgment perform as a valid decision by a quorum according the Supreme Court's decisions in NGuyen v. U.S. , 539 U.S. 6… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6818 |
Romeo Kevante Pride v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abuse-of-discretion appellate-review criminal-sentencing due-process eighth-amendment sentencing-guidelines |
WHETHER THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERRED BY DENYING MR. PRIDE'S ARGUMENT THAT THE DISTRICT COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR BY IMPOSING A 110… |
-6.5 |
| 23-6820 |
Marvin Carcamo v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure gang-membership harmless-error ninth-circuit procedural-error racketeering rico-conspiracy sentencing-guidelines |
1. Did the Ninth Circuit incorrectly affirm the district court's procedural error determining racketeering conduct was reasonably foreseeable under th… |
-6.5 |