No. 23-6482

Christopher J. Barnett v. Oklahoma

Lower Court: Oklahoma
Docketed: 2024-01-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-review brady-rule constitutional-provisions conviction-integrity criminal-procedure due-process judicial-process legal-jurisdiction petition-review prosecutorial-misconduct supreme-court-procedure writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference: 2024-03-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

MAY A COURT ENFORCE BRADY AND NAPUE VIOLATIONS THAT JEOPARDIZE A DEFENDANT'S RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL AND DOES THE BRADY/NAPUE ISSUES ARISE WHEN A CHANGED TULSA COUNTY RULE AND THE OK CT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS NOT ADDRESS THE JUDGE CONTINUING TO HOLD AN USURPATION OF OK RULE 57?

DOES BIAS JUDGE CONTINUE TO REIGN AND THE 68 O&O NOT ADDRESS THE ISSUE AT 2-17?

WAS CONVICTION OBTAINED IN VIOLATION OF MAPPLE & BRADY?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the trial court and the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals erred in continuing to hold that the defendant's conviction stands despite a violation of the Brady rule

Docket Entries

2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2023-12-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 12, 2024)

Attorneys

Christopher J. Barnett
Christopher J. Barnett — Petitioner