1. Should the Court of appeals recall its mandate denying Petitioner's application for a certificate of appealability (COA) when Petitioner has demonstrated actual innocence in light of the new evidence presented in his §2255 motion or a change in law?

2. Should the Court of appeals recall its mandate denying Petitioner's application for a COA when Petitioner has shown that a fraudulent conduct was carried out by the district Court in order to serve its biased and unjust opinion that there existed no actual conflict of interest in this case?

Whether the court of appeals erred in denying petitioner's motion to recall its mandate when petitioner has demonstrated actual innocence or a change in law