Whether despite evidence that the fundamental witness of the prosecution, in the shape of violation passed on the divergeceptions of Thomas Valdez Guilford, who presented himself as an all-knowing one omni present witness but all the players in aed activities of the Competing lig cgi Hen lt ti avd nnyactions and the Victims mule in Poctiolot Cul) Jetted he se vovis-things Hon us bathe' slop path shea cide Playgidf-he su.

Whether the fundamental fairness of the criminal trial was violated by the district court's denial of the petitioner's motion to dismiss the indictment based on the unreliable and incredible testimony of the government's key witness