No. 23-6456
Tyree Earl Ford v. Carmine Marceno, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-litigation civil-procedure constitutional-rights court-orders due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure judicial-review legal-procedure standing summary-judgment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-03-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
ZdusS (l) ujA/ Mi hsZZtcZ c'oo/S Jizz^&d ?A&</
/«3 r/<? k<Ztr*J /sZt* o£ &»t/ prscid*/* /* CA)0-3)^J a -SW^*/y
dZ&fw/Z JvJjisntjtf fiQf fig a ~.£6/ mp/tdAc-t. dPf/i*. £Z c/&y fejv/'we.AZ- -Ar 4. t&Hpe/k/est-Z
f# terse- -/Ae, pZdtnZf// wrZfi an wSUz/' -fo <,V/A A/zJ ?&ujr>
Qfdcr fr£ dfo €&<'/'*'?
(j) Me /A MidJ/e ZySf/tL* CoorZ- <foC {,#**.*+$ oM^Qt torZhou^ &'''?$
offtU+Z gad W S/jMZt'Se* ? £ se-c exhdzs s 3
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court followed the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and granted summary judgment for non-compliance with the Court's order
Docket Entries
2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-02-08
Brief of respondent Carmine Marceno, et al. in opposition filed.
2023-12-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 12, 2024)
Attorneys
Carmine Marceno
Gregg A. Toomey — The Toomey Law Firm, Respondent
Tyree E. Ford
Tyree Earl Ford — Petitioner