No. 20-6272
Domonic Devarrise Usher v. United States
Tags: 18-usc-924(c)(3)(a) circuit-split crime-of-violence criminal-law force-clause hobbs-act johnson-v-united-states sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-03-15
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Hobbs Act robbery, which can be committed by putting another in fear of future injury to himself, his property, or even his intangible property, is a crime of violence that necessarily requires violent force under the force clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Hobbs Act robbery is a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)
Docket Entries
2024-03-18
Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner DENIED.
2024-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2023-05-04
Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner.
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-13
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2021-01-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 13, 2021.
2021-01-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 11, 2021 to January 13, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-12-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 11, 2021.
2020-12-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 10, 2020 to January 11, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-11-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 10, 2020)
Attorneys
Domonic Devarrise Usher
Domonic Usher — Petitioner
Domonic Usher
Eric Joseph Brignac — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent