1. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) permits conviction for the possession of any firearm
that has ever crossed state lines at any time in the indefinite past, and, if so,
if it is facially unconstitutional?

2. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) comports with the Second Amendment?

3. Subsidiary Question: Whether this Court should hold the instant Petition
pending United States v. Rahimi, cert. granted, 143 S. Ct. 2688 (No. 22-915) (oral
argument heard Nov. 7, 2023), given the government's concession in its Petition
for Certiorari in Garland v. Range, (No. 23-374) that Rahimi presents "closely
related Second Amendment issues" with respect to constitutional challenges to
18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and urges this Court to "hold the petition for a writ of
certiorari' in Range "pending its decision Rahimi[?]?

Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) permits conviction for the possession of any firearm that has ever crossed state lines at any time in the indefinite past, and, if so, if it is facially unconstitutional?