1) first: 4:99-01.2-BCW; When wasLibfie Federal Government allowed to "open" a [case]
against me in 1999, and when was any indictment fitst made public to infont me of
any criminal charge the same government made in 1999'^bf since then?

2) Where is that indictment today?

3) In today's world in the criminal and civil court system, how is it that I was
never afforded dus process of law by indictment in 1999 and why/how did all of the
courts miss that, very important fact of law for over 26 years now?

4) In 1999, in the WD of MO Federal District Court, how could a [case] number ever
be assigned to no [case] ever established by any process of law?

5) How could a Magistrate ever be assigned to any non-filed [Case] by a judge
who was never assigned to any "OPEN [CASE] to judge by administrating that trial in
never scheduled nor filed in a court in 1999?

S; How could a non-assignea judge commission a Magistrate to conduct no trial in
a never filed [civil action] in 1999?

•7c) When was I ever notified of any criminal complaint charge ever lodged against
me by that Magistrate to physically abuse me in 1999, 2010 and since then, when I
was never informed of any charge in 1999 to be so abused by him to be prosecuted
per the laws enforcing the Cbristitution; 18USC§1512(c)(3) ,(4) as by cops et al
denying me my right to inform a judge of the United States of the commission of a
federal offense?. '

8) How could anyone be condemned by the courts solely on the words of a known liar
to be falsely imprisoned for the past 26 years without notification of any. charged
criminal act nor arraigned to plead nor tried'nor ever convicted so never sentenced
to any prison's custody all in the name of justice gone so awry, and causing a
proceeding or prosecution to be commenced against another person for the commission
of a federal offense as to be protected by the law. 18USG§1512(c)(3 '), (4) and by the
rule of law as in the SCOTUS' opinion in FEb 17, 1941 Smith v O'Grady 312US329,334
61Sct572 85Led859; [Notice..the first and most universally recognized requirement
of due process].

9) Will the SCOTUS honor and uphold/enforce what they/you wrote that [we the people
read as caselaw and rely on as citeable and enforceable precedent, in June 4, 1934
Lynch v US 292US571 54SCt840 78Ledl434fndnt 3; [Valid contracts are property, and
as such are protected from taking without just compensation, whether the obligor
is a private individual, a municipality, a State or the United States]?

10) Since I paid the county the property taxes they asked, does that constitute a
contract the State cannot pass any law impairing the obligation of that agreement
for 1 year at a time that ray real property is inviolate from seizure by any State
agent by force without just

Whether the police officer's warrantless trespassing on the petitioner's private property was justified, and whether the petitioner's subsequent request for government assistance in prosecuting the officer constituted the petitioner's right to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property, as well as the right to enforce contracts