internet-access
15 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24A40 | New York State Telecommunications Association, Inc., et al. v. Letitia James, Attorney General of New York | Second Circuit | 2024-07-15 | Presumed Complete | broadband federal-law internet-access preemption state-regulation telecommunications | Question not identified. | |
| 23-6161 | Norman Javier Herrera Pastran v. United States | Eleventh Circuit | 2023-12-04 | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | commerce-clause criminal-law criminal-statute due-process first-amendment free-speech internet-access sex-offender supervised-release | 1. Whether the constitutional holding of Packingham v. North Carolina, 137 S. Ct. 1730 (2017)—which recognized a First Amendment right to access the I… |
| 23-5835 | Sean Christopher Finnell v. United States | Eleventh Circuit | 2023-10-18 | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | constitutional-rights criminal-defendants first-amendment internet-access packingham-v-north-carolina sex-offenders sixth-amendment supervised-release | 1. In Packingham v. North Carolina, 582 U.S. 98 (2017), the Court held that a North Carolina statute prohibiting registered sex offenders from accessi… |
| 22-7802 | James B. Norris, Jr. v. United States | Eighth Circuit | 2023-06-16 | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | appellate-review circuit-split criminal-procedure due-process internet-access judicial-explanation pro-se-motion revocation-hearing sentencing sentencing-discretion supervised-release | Whether the Eighth Circuit erred – contrary to the holdings of the Second, Fourth, Seventh, Ninth, Eleventh, and D.C. Circuit Courts of Appeals, which… |
| 22-7471 | Renzo Alegre v. United States | Eleventh Circuit | 2023-05-05 | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | circuit-split constitutional-law first-amendment internet-access sex-offenders supervised-release | Does the constitutional holding of Packingham v. North Carolina, 137 S. Ct. 1730 (2017) — which recognized a First Amendment right to access the Inter… |
| 22-5623 | Freda J. Day v. Oprah Winfrey, et al. | Fourth Circuit | 2022-09-20 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | civil-rights copyright-infringement discovery-stage due-process electronic-communications internet-access spoliation-of-evidence substantial-similarities summary-judgment | 1. Throughout the 21st century with a myriad of electronic communications, why shouldn't "use of the internet" be a primary determining factor for pro… |
| 22-5340 | Jonathan Wells v. United States | Ninth Circuit | 2022-08-11 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment free-speech internet-access packingham-v-north-carolina sex-offenders supervised-release | Whether the same First Amendment principles in Packingham apply to sex offenders on supervised release and prohibit untailored bans on internet use du… |
| 21-7103 | Roger D. Ream v. Florida | Florida | 2022-02-11 | Rehearing | Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | civil-rights due-process first-amendment internet-access liberty-interest liberty-rights packingham-v-north-carolina probation-conditions property-rights supervised-release | Under the First Amendment, does a person on probation or other form of supervised release have a constitutional right to access the Internet or other… |
| 20-7944 | Peter Bobal v. United States | Eleventh Circuit | 2021-05-05 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | circuit-split civil-rights constitutional-law due-process first-amendment internet-access sex-offender supervised-release | Does the constitutional holding of Packingham v. North Carolina, 137 S. Ct. 1730 (2017) ─ which recognized a First Amendment right to access the Inter… |
| 20-6863 | Tommy Findley v. United States | Eleventh Circuit | 2021-01-13 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | circuit-split federal-court-review first-amendment fourth-amendment internet-access probable-cause state-law-application supervised-release warrant-application warrant-probable-cause | 1. Whether a federal court is required to apply controlling state law in determining whether facts omitted from a warrant application vitiate probable… |
| 18-7977 | James Mowery v. United States | Fifth Circuit | 2019-02-14 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | circuit-split civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process fifth-circuit first-amendment free-speech internet-access internet-restrictions packingham-precedent packingham-v-north-carolina social-media-access standing supervised-release | I. In Packingham v. North Carolina, 137 S. Ct. 1730 (2017), this Court found unconstitutional a criminal statute prohibiting sex offenders from access… |
| 18-7084 | Anthony Steven Young v. United States | Sixth Circuit | 2018-12-18 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | abuse-of-discretion child-pornography close-scrutiny criminal-sentencing district-court-discretion internet-access relevant-conduct sentencing sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review ussg-2g2.2 | 1. What standard of review applies to the district court's decision to use the guideline for receiving or distributing child pornography to sentence … |
| 18-6421 | Alexis D. Negron-Cruz v. United States | First Circuit | 2018-10-24 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-counsel internet-access internet-restrictions plea-agreement plea-bargaining pornography-ban sentencing supervised-release supervised-release-conditions | Whether District Court erred in imposing overbroad conditions of Supervised Release, limiting Petitioner's access to the Internet, for the term of sai… |
| 18-6150 | Noel Aquino-Florenciani v. United States | First Circuit | 2018-10-01 | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | abuse-of-discretion child-pornography criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process internet-access internet-access-ban sentencing sentencing-guidelines supervised-release | Whether the court's imposition of a total ban of internet access as a condition of supervised release is an overly broad and restrictive and without a… |
| 18-53 | Lance Dillard, aka Double v. United States | Seventh Circuit | 2018-07-10 | Denied | Response Waived | constitutional-safeguards criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial internet-access internet-publicity judicial-controls juror-misconduct jury-instructions prejudicial-publicity sixth-amendment | Whether the judicial controls utilized in a criminal trial were so constitutionally inadequate to deter or prevent jurors from accessing prejudicial p… |