No. 22-5340
Jonathan Wells v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment free-speech internet-access packingham-v-north-carolina sex-offenders supervised-release
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment Privacy
FirstAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the same First Amendment principles in Packingham apply to sex offenders on supervised release and prohibit untailored bans on internet use during the period of supervision?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the same First Amendment principles in Packingham apply to sex offenders on supervised release and prohibit untailored bans on internet use during the period of supervision?
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-08-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 12, 2022)
Attorneys
Jonathan Wells
Leah Linda Spero — Spero Law Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent