No. 18-53
Lance Dillard, aka Double v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: constitutional-safeguards criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial internet-access internet-publicity judicial-controls juror-misconduct jury-instructions prejudicial-publicity sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the judicial controls utilized in a criminal trial were so constitutionally inadequate to deter or prevent jurors from accessing prejudicial publicity via the Internet, such that Petitioner's right to a fair trial was not properly or adequately safeguarded?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
fair-trial
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-09
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Lance Dillard
John S. Skilton — Perkins Coie LLP, Petitioner