telecommunications

12 cases — ← All topics

Case Title Lower Court Docketed Status Flags Tags Question Presented
24A138 New York State Telecommunications Association, Inc., et al. v. Letitia A. James, Attorney General of New York Second Circuit 2024-08-07 Denied commerce-clause infrastructure-regulation interstate-commerce state-regulation telecommunications wireless-networks Question not identified.
24A40 New York State Telecommunications Association, Inc., et al. v. Letitia James, Attorney General of New York Second Circuit 2024-07-15 Presumed Complete broadband federal-law internet-access preemption state-regulation telecommunications Question not identified.
23-6200 Courtney Green v. LG Electronics USA, et al. Third Circuit 2023-12-08 Denied Relisted (2)IFP civil-rights consumer-privacy data-collection defamation electronic-surveillance invasion-of-privacy racketeering telecommunications Whether the respondent LG Electronics Inc. aided in corrupt intent and racketeer influenced acts.These actions being undoubtedly ignored over a cours…
22-6398 Deon Lewis Duke v. Microsoft Corporation, et al. Seventh Circuit 2022-12-27 Denied IFP access-to-courts civil-rights conspiracy corruption criminal-record delusion due-process law-enforcement property-rights standing telecommunications Question not identified.
21-7115 Robert Stahlnecker v. United States Ninth Circuit 2022-02-15 Denied Response WaivedIFP communications-law constitutional-challenge criminal-law first-amendment free-speech political-speech statutory-interpretation telecommunications Does 47 U.S.C. § 223(a)(1)(C) violate the First Amendment when applied to political speech, as it was in this case?
21-629 Santa Fe Alliance for Public Health and Safety, et al. v. City of Santa Fe, New Mexico, et al. Tenth Circuit 2021-10-29 Denied Amici (1)Response Waived access-to-courts constitutional-rights due-process free-speech preemption radio-frequency-radiation right-of-access-to-courts right-to-petition takings telecommunications telecommunications-act 1. Whether by 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(iv) the preemption of any State remedy for injury by telecommunications facilities without providing a substitu…
20-917 800 Services, Inc. v. AT&T Corp. Third Circuit 2021-01-08 Denied Response Waived administrative-law appellate-review federal-communications-commission federal-courts fraud-on-court fraud-on-the-court jurisdiction primary-jurisdiction tariff tariff-interpretation telecommunications 1) Whether the Third Circuit Court of Appeals Erred in Failing to Refer this Questions of Tariff Interpretation to the FCC Under the Doctrine of Prima…
20-6392 Peter Gakuba v. United States District of Columbia 2020-11-20 Denied Response WaivedIFP 4th-amendment civil-rights declaratory-relief electronic-communications federal-circuit-court privacy privacy-protection search-and-seizure standing statutory-interpretation telecommunications AS A MATTER OF LAW, GAKUBA IS EHTITLED TO EQUITABLE RELIEF PER 18 USE S27IO(E+ SC8) COHBISTEMT W LIKEWISE THE SAME EOURABLE REUEF 1S DOUBLY AFFORDED …
19-5766 Tham Bui v. California California 2019-08-30 Denied Response WaivedIFP 4th-amendment cell-phone cell-phone-location-data cell-phone-privacy fourth-amendment fourth-amendment-search gps gps-tracking location-data privacy reasonable-expectation-of-privacy telecommunications Did petitioner have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the contemporaneous Global Positioning System coordinates transmitted by the petitioner's c…
18-8752 Kulwant Singh Sandhu v. United States Ninth Circuit 2019-04-10 Denied Response WaivedIFP administrative-law circuit-split criminal-law criminal-speech first-amendment free-speech harassment public-policy statutory-interpretation telecommunications telephone-harassment (1) Does 47 U.S.C. subsection 223(a)(1)(D) prohibit only the harassment caused by repeatedly ringing a telephone or does it also prohibit repeated ver…
18-1258 Enclarity Inc., et al. v. Matthew N. Fulton Sixth Circuit 2019-03-29 GVR Response RequestedRelisted (2) civil-procedure commercial-availability commercial-communication commercial-transaction communication-law due-process fax-regulation information-request standing statutory-interpretation telecommunications telephone-consumer-protection-act unsolicited-advertisement unsolicited-faxes Whether faxes that only request information and propose no commercial transaction with recipients are "advertisements" under the TCPA.
18-8517 Roderick Jermaine Hall v. Sprint Corporation Fourth Circuit 2019-03-22 Denied IFP antitrust civil-rights consumer-protection contract-disclosure contract-law disability-rights disclosure-requirements due-process false-advertising federal-regulations network-management service-limitations telecommunications telecommunications-law COURT HAS Jurisdiction 28 USC 1331: FEDERAL QUESTION Sprint fail to disclose information on any documents or website that has Sprint logo or Public No…