No. 18-1258
Enclarity Inc., et al. v. Matthew N. Fulton
Tags: civil-procedure commercial-availability commercial-communication commercial-transaction communication-law due-process fax-regulation information-request standing statutory-interpretation telecommunications telephone-consumer-protection-act unsolicited-advertisement unsolicited-faxes
Key Terms:
Securities Privacy ClassAction
Securities Privacy ClassAction
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether faxes that only request information and propose no commercial transaction with recipients are "advertisements" under the TCPA.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether faxes that only request information and propose no commercial transaction with recipients are 'advertisements' under the TCPA
Docket Entries
2019-11-08
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2019-10-07
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc., 588 U. S. ___ (2019).
2019-07-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-02
Reply of petitioners Enclarity Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
2019-06-13
Brief of respondent Matthew N. Fulton in opposition filed.
2019-05-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-14
Response Requested. (Due June 13, 2019)
2019-03-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 29, 2019)
Attorneys
Enclarity Inc., et al.
Joseph Russell Palmore — Morrison & Foerster LLP, Petitioner
Matthew N. Fulton
Phillip A. Bock — Bock, Hatch, Lewis & Oppenheim, LLC, Respondent