No. 20-917
800 Services, Inc. v. AT&T Corp.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-law appellate-review federal-communications-commission federal-courts fraud-on-court fraud-on-the-court jurisdiction primary-jurisdiction tariff tariff-interpretation telecommunications
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) Whether the Third Circuit Court of Appeals
Erred in Failing to Refer this Questions of Tariff
Interpretation to the FCC Under the Doctrine of Primary Jurisdiction.
2) Whether the Third Circuit Court of Appeals
Erred in Failing to Recognize the Numerous Instances of Fraud on the Court Asserted by Petitioner.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Third Circuit Court of Appeals Erred in Failing to Refer this Questions of Tariff Interpretation to the FCC Under the Doctrine of Primary Jurisdiction
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-12
Waiver of right of respondent AT & T Corp. to respond filed.
2021-01-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 8, 2021)
Attorneys
800 Services, Inc.
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner
AT & T Corp.
Richard H. Brown — Day Pitney LLP, Respondent