Did South Dakota Supreme Court abuse its discretion, affirming South Dakota Fourth
Judicial Circuit Court 's dismissal of Petitioner 's Petition For Writ Of Error Coram Nobis,
bringing Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment violation claims, holding:
'barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel, error in an indictment or information
inadequate to merit relief under coram nobis;
petitioner suffered no prejudice to a substantial right in State Supreme Court 's failure to
1 2 conclude the law on its finding petitioner met the statutory burden of proof on a
constitutionally invalid plea;
Gregory v. State, 353 N.W.2d 777 (S.D. 1984) not overturned by later South Dakota
Supreme Court decisions;
coram nobis does not cover issues of cruel and unusual punishment for petitioner being
imprisoned in excess of the maximum penalty for his felony class conviction '?

Did the South Dakota Supreme Court abuse its discretion in dismissing the petitioner's writ of error coram nobis?