| 24-6739 |
Christopher L. Smith v. Ohio |
Ohio |
2025-03-11 |
Denied |
IFP |
batson-challenge due-process expert-witness-testimony fair-trial jury-discrimination prosecutorial-misconduct |
1.) The question for this Court is whether the Ohio trial court clearly erred in not conducting the three-step analysis of Batson v. Kentucky 476 U.S.… |
| 24-6591 |
Kimberly Sponaugle v. United States |
Third Circuit |
2025-02-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure expert-disclosure expert-witness-testimony federal-rules-of-evidence lay-opinion wire-fraud |
Whether the trial court erred as a matter of law in ruling that F.R.E. 701 permitted the prosecution to present in its case-in-chief lay opinion testi… |
| 23-6611 |
Morice Ervin v. Indiana |
Indiana |
2024-01-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment constitutional-rights due-process expert-testimony expert-witness-testimony fair-trial favorable-evidence fourteenth-amendment lack-of-evidence post-autopsy prejudicial-questioning |
Whether petitioner's Due process - 14th Amendment of the Federal Constitution was violated by allowing post autopsy?
Whether petitioner's Due process… |
| 22-5054 |
Tyrik Upchurch v. United States |
Third Circuit |
2022-07-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review due-process evidence-rules expert-testimony expert-witness-testimony judicial-procedure judicial-proceedings lay-witness-testimony new-trial standard-of-review third-circuit trial-error |
Did the Court of Appeal s for the Thi rd Ci rcuit so far depart from the accepted
and usual course of judi cial proceedi ngs, or sancti oned such a de… |
| 20-5629 |
Lester Waller v. Vance Laughlin, Warden |
Georgia |
2020-09-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
due-process expert-witness-testimony fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance prosecutorial-misconduct right-to-counsel sixth-amendment trial-court-error waiver-of-counsel |
Did the Trial Court err when it determined Defendant's waiver of counsel was valid thus violating his Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel and his Fourtee… |
| 19-855 |
Lenin Lugo v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-01-08 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
circuit-split expert-witness expert-witness-testimony federal-rules-of-evidence law-enforcement-opinion lay-witness lay-witness-testimony professional-experience rule-701 rule-702 |
Under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in opinion fo… |
| 19-472 |
City of East Cleveland, Ohio, et al. v. Charles Hunt, et al. |
Ohio |
2019-10-10 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
abuse-of-discretion bifurcation civil-litigation civil-procedure civil-procedure-bifurcation discretion emergency-vehicle-immunity expert-witness-testimony juror-misconduct manifest-weight-of-evidence motion motion-to-bifurcate trial trial-court-discretion trial-procedure |
1. Whether the Trial Court abused its discretion when it denied Petitioners' Motion to Bifurcate the trial.
2. Whether the Trial Court abused its dis… |
| 19-2 |
Jackie Hosang Lawson v. FMR LLC, dba Fidelity Investments, et al. |
First Circuit |
2019-06-28 |
Denied |
|
attorney-fees civil-procedure civil-rights due-process expert-witness-testimony federal-securities-law federal-securities-laws fraud fraud-allegations jury-instruction jury-instructions legal-standards sarbanes-oxley-act securities |
Is the jury verdict just and proper on the two deciding questions whether "Fidelity's conduct could constitute violation of Federal law relating to fr… |
| 18-9737 |
Laquan L. Kellam v. United States |
Third Circuit |
2019-06-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure eighth-amendment eighth-amendment-rights expert-witness-testimony fifth-amendment fifth-amendment-rights fourteenth-amendment fourteenth-amendment-rights fourth-amendment fourth-amendment-rights procedural-error search-and-seizure sixth-amendment sixth-amendment-rights statutory-interpretation warrantless-arrest |
1. DID THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ABUSE ITS DISCRETIONARY, BROADLY-BASED AUTHORITY OF INTERPRETATION, THUS, VIOLATING PE… |
| 18-1551 |
Joseph Q. Mirarchi v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel |
Pennsylvania |
2019-06-19 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
attorney-disbarment constitutional-rights disbarment due-process due-process-clause effective-assistance-of-counsel expert-witness-testimony fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel medical-evidence mitigation-evidence neuropsychological-evidence sixth-amendment |
Whether the state supreme court order for attorney disbarment is inconsistent with the standards set forth in Selling v. Radford, 243 U.S. 46, 50-51 (… |
| 18-9446 |
Davon Kelly Bennett v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-05-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
confrontation-clause criminal-procedure cross-examination custodial-interrogation daubert-standard due-process evidence expert-witness-testimony motion-to-suppress rule-404b sixth-amendment |
1. Whether the District Court deprived Petitioner of his right to confront witnesses by limiting defense counsel's opportunity to cross-examine the go… |
| 18-246 |
Mary L. Doherty, et al. v. Allstate Indemnity Company |
Third Circuit |
2018-08-27 |
Denied |
|
anderson-v-liberty-lobby due-process expert-witness expert-witness-reports expert-witness-testimony fifth-amendment hearsay hearsay-evidence insurance-contract jury-trial mend-the-hold mend-the-hold-doctrine seventh-amendment summary-judgment |
Whether the affirmed Rule 56 summary judgment decision is inconsistent with the standard set forth in Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1… |