Is the jury verdict just and proper on the two deciding questions whether "Fidelity's conduct could constitute violation of Federal law relating to fraud against Fidelity's mutual Fund shareholders," where the jury was not made aware of what constitutes "violation of Federal law relating to fraud"?

Which party; the Petitioner or the Respondents, is liable for the attorney fees incurred for getting coverage for the Respondents under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, on March 04, 2014, at the United States Supreme Court?

Is the jury verdict just and proper on the two deciding questions where the jury was not made aware of what constitutes violation of Federal law relating to fraud?